MAX_LOW_SURROGATE, MAX_HIGH_SURROGATE, MIN_LOW_SURROGATE, MIN_HIGH_SURROGATE,
    };
    for (char surrogate : surrogates) {
      builder.add(newString(surrogate));
      builder.add(newString(surrogate, 'n'));
      builder.add(newString('n', surrogate));
      builder.add(newString(surrogate, surrogate));
    }
    builder.add(newString(MIN_LOW_SURROGATE, MAX_HIGH_SURROGATE));
    ILL_FORMED_STRINGS = builder.build();
  }

	}

	// check for proceeding surrogate pair
	c = d.next()
	if !utf16.IsSurrogate(r) || c != '\\' {
		d.scratch.addRune(r)
		goto scan
	}
	if c = d.next(); c != 'u' {
		d.scratch.addRune(r)
		goto scan_esc
	}

	r2 := d.u4()
	if r2 < 0 {
		return "", d.mkError(ErrSyntax, "in unicode escape sequence")
	}

	// write surrogate pair
	d.scratch.addRune(utf16.DecodeRune(r, r2))

   *             surrogate is returned.</b>
   *         <li><b>If the next character was a valid low surrogate, the code point value of the
   *             high/low surrogate pair is returned.</b>
   *         <li>If the next character was not a low surrogate value, then {@link
   *             IllegalArgumentException} is thrown.
   *       </ol>

                try {
                    char low = version.charAt(i + 1);
                    char[] both = {character, low};
                    c = Character.codePointAt(both, 0);
                    i++;
                } catch (IndexOutOfBoundsException ex) {

   * for use with it (such as all-ASCII text) and for simple debugging text. When using this method,
   * consider the following:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>it may split surrogate pairs
   *   <li>it may split characters and combining characters
   *   <li>it does not consider word boundaries
   *   <li>if truncating for display to users, there are other considerations that must be taken

    }
  }

  /**
   * This verifies that putUnencodedChars(String) and hashUnencodedChars(String) are equivalent,
   * even for funny strings composed by (possibly unmatched, and mostly illegal) surrogate
   * characters. (But doesn't test that they do the right thing - just their consistency).
   */
  private static void assertHashStringWithSurrogatesEquivalence(
      HashFunction hashFunction, Random random) {

    }
  }

  /**
   * This verifies that putUnencodedChars(String) and hashUnencodedChars(String) are equivalent,
   * even for funny strings composed by (possibly unmatched, and mostly illegal) surrogate
   * characters. (But doesn't test that they do the right thing - just their consistency).
   */
  private static void assertHashStringWithSurrogatesEquivalence(
      HashFunction hashFunction, Random random) {