* result in the chain, or will be zero if every comparison result was zero.
 *
 * <p><b>Note:</b> {@code ComparisonChain} instances are <b>immutable</b>. For this utility to work
 * correctly, calls must be chained as illustrated above.
 *
 * <p>Performance note: Even though the {@code ComparisonChain} caller always invokes its {@code
 * compare} methods unconditionally, the {@code ComparisonChain} implementation stops calling its

 *       assertions are for. Note that assertions are not enabled by default; they are essentially
 *       considered "compiled comments."
 *   <li>An explicit {@code if/throw} (as illustrated below) is always acceptable; we still
 *       recommend using our {@link VerifyException} exception type. Throwing a plain {@link
 *       RuntimeException} is frowned upon.

 * result in the chain, or will be zero if every comparison result was zero.
 *
 * <p><b>Note:</b> {@code ComparisonChain} instances are <b>immutable</b>. For this utility to work
 * correctly, calls must be chained as illustrated above.
 *
 * <p>Performance note: Even though the {@code ComparisonChain} caller always invokes its {@code
 * compare} methods unconditionally, the {@code ComparisonChain} implementation stops calling its

   *   }
   * }
   * </pre>
   *
   * @param throwable the Throwable to propagate
   * @return nothing will ever be returned; this return type is only for your convenience, as
   *     illustrated in the example above
   * @deprecated To preserve behavior, use {@code throw e} or {@code throw new RuntimeException(e)}
   *     directly, or use a combination of {@link #throwIfUnchecked} and {@code throw new

 *       assertions are for. Note that assertions are not enabled by default; they are essentially
 *       considered "compiled comments."
 *   <li>An explicit {@code if/throw} (as illustrated below) is always acceptable; we still
 *       recommend using our {@link VerifyException} exception type. Throwing a plain {@link
 *       RuntimeException} is frowned upon.

   *   }
   * }
   * </pre>
   *
   * @param throwable the Throwable to propagate
   * @return nothing will ever be returned; this return type is only for your convenience, as
   *     illustrated in the example above
   * @deprecated To preserve behavior, use {@code throw e} or {@code throw new RuntimeException(e)}
   *     directly, or use a combination of {@link #throwIfUnchecked} and {@code throw new

  @Override
  public void add(Range<C> rangeToAdd) {
    checkNotNull(rangeToAdd);

    if (rangeToAdd.isEmpty()) {
      return;
    }

    // We will use { } to illustrate ranges currently in the range set, and < >
    // to illustrate rangeToAdd.
    Cut<C> lbToAdd = rangeToAdd.lowerBound;
    Cut<C> ubToAdd = rangeToAdd.upperBound;

    Entry<Cut<C>, Range<C>> entryBelowLb = rangesByLowerBound.lowerEntry(lbToAdd);

        @Override
        protected List<LockGraphNode> initialValue() {
          return newArrayListWithCapacity(3);
        }
      };

  /**
   * A Throwable used to record a stack trace that illustrates an example of a specific lock
   * acquisition ordering. The top of the stack trace is truncated such that it starts with the
   * acquisition of the lock in question, e.g.
   *
   * <pre>

   *       contained by the latter range)
   * </ul>
   *
   * <p>Note that if {@code a.encloses(b)}, then {@code b.contains(v)} implies {@code
   * a.contains(v)}, but as the last two examples illustrate, the converse is not always true.
   *
   * <p>Being reflexive, antisymmetric and transitive, the {@code encloses} relation defines a

   *       contained by the latter range)
   * </ul>
   *
   * <p>Note that if {@code a.encloses(b)}, then {@code b.contains(v)} implies {@code
   * a.contains(v)}, but as the last two examples illustrate, the converse is not always true.
   *
   * <p>Being reflexive, antisymmetric and transitive, the {@code encloses} relation defines a