*       assertions are for. Note that assertions are not enabled by default; they are essentially
 *       considered "compiled comments."
 *   <li>An explicit {@code if/throw} (as illustrated below) is always acceptable; we still
 *       recommend using our {@link VerifyException} exception type. Throwing a plain {@link
 *       RuntimeException} is frowned upon.

 *       assertions are for. Note that assertions are not enabled by default; they are essentially
 *       considered "compiled comments."
 *   <li>An explicit {@code if/throw} (as illustrated below) is always acceptable; we still
 *       recommend using our {@link VerifyException} exception type. Throwing a plain {@link
 *       RuntimeException} is frowned upon.

   *   }
   * }
   * </pre>
   *
   * @param throwable the Throwable to propagate
   * @return nothing will ever be returned; this return type is only for your convenience, as
   *     illustrated in the example above
   * @deprecated To preserve behavior, use {@code throw e} or {@code throw new RuntimeException(e)}
   *     directly, or use a combination of {@link #throwIfUnchecked} and {@code throw new

        protected ArrayList<LockGraphNode> initialValue() {
          return Lists.<LockGraphNode>newArrayListWithCapacity(3);
        }
      };

  /**
   * A Throwable used to record a stack trace that illustrates an example of a specific lock
   * acquisition ordering. The top of the stack trace is truncated such that it starts with the
   * acquisition of the lock in question, e.g.
   *
   * <pre>

   *       contained by the latter range)
   * </ul>
   *
   * <p>Note that if {@code a.encloses(b)}, then {@code b.contains(v)} implies {@code
   * a.contains(v)}, but as the last two examples illustrate, the converse is not always true.
   *
   * <p>Being reflexive, antisymmetric and transitive, the {@code encloses} relation defines a

   *       contained by the latter range)
   * </ul>
   *
   * <p>Note that if {@code a.encloses(b)}, then {@code b.contains(v)} implies {@code
   * a.contains(v)}, but as the last two examples illustrate, the converse is not always true.
   *
   * <p>Being reflexive, antisymmetric and transitive, the {@code encloses} relation defines a

  public void testNullPointerExceptions() {
    NullPointerTester tester = new NullPointerTester();
    tester.testAllPublicStaticMethods(Lists.class);
  }

  /**
   * This is just here to illustrate how {@code Arrays#asList} differs from {@code
   * Lists#newArrayList}.
   */
  public void testArraysAsList() {
    List<String> ourWay = Lists.newArrayList("foo", "bar", "baz");

  public void testNullPointerExceptions() {
    NullPointerTester tester = new NullPointerTester();
    tester.testAllPublicStaticMethods(Lists.class);
  }

  /**
   * This is just here to illustrate how {@code Arrays#asList} differs from {@code
   * Lists#newArrayList}.
   */
  public void testArraysAsList() {
    List<String> ourWay = Lists.newArrayList("foo", "bar", "baz");