* This avoids out-of-control memory consumption, and it keeps the cache from growing so
         * large that doing the lookup is noticeably slower than redoing the work would be.
         *
         * Ideally we'd have a real eviction policy, but until we see a problem in practice, I hope
         * that this will suffice. I have not even benchmarked with different size limits.
         */
        if (validClasses.size() > 1000) {

    putEdge(N1, N2);
    assertThat(graph.outDegree(N1)).isEqualTo(2);
  }

  // Stable order tests

  // Note: Stable order means that the ordering doesn't change between iterations and versions.
  // Ideally, the ordering in test should never be updated.
  @Test
  public void stableIncidentEdgeOrder_edges_returnsInStableOrder() {
    assume().that(graph.incidentEdgeOrder().type()).isEqualTo(ElementOrder.Type.STABLE);

   * without contention. Because assignment of entries to these partitions is not necessarily
   * uniform, the actual concurrency observed may vary. Ideally, you should choose a value to
   * accommodate as many threads as will ever concurrently modify the table. Using a significantly
   * higher value than you need can waste space and time, and a significantly lower value can lead

    putEdge(N2, N1);
    assertThat(graph.outDegree(N1)).isEqualTo(3);
  }

  // Stable order tests

  // Note: Stable order means that the ordering doesn't change between iterations and versions.
  // Ideally, the ordering in test should never be updated.
  @Test
  public void stableIncidentEdgeOrder_edges_returnsInStableOrder() {
    assume().that(graph.incidentEdgeOrder().type()).isEqualTo(ElementOrder.Type.STABLE);

    OVERREPORTING_SIZE_LIST = unmodifiableList(new MisleadingSizeList<>(collection123, 1));
  }

  /*
   * c.g.c.collect.testing.Helpers.misleadingSizeList has a broken Iterator, so we can't use it. (I
   * mean, ideally we'd fix it....) Also, we specifically need a List so that we trigger the fast
   * path in join(Iterable).
   */
  private static final class MisleadingSizeList<E extends @Nullable Object>
      extends ForwardingList<E> {

   * without contention. Because assignment of entries to these partitions is not necessarily
   * uniform, the actual concurrency observed may vary. Ideally, you should choose a value to
   * accommodate as many threads as will ever concurrently modify the table. Using a significantly
   * higher value than you need can waste space and time, and a significantly lower value can lead

     * all other executions until finished.
     * We also lock on a given project to forbid a forked lifecycle to be executed concurrently with the project.
     * TODO: ideally, the builder should take care of the ordering in a smarter way
     * TODO: and concurrency issues fixed with MNG-7157
     */
    protected class ProjectLock implements NoExceptionCloseable {

    putEdge(N2, N1);
    assertThat(graph.outDegree(N1)).isEqualTo(3);
  }

  // Stable order tests

  // Note: Stable order means that the ordering doesn't change between iterations and versions.
  // Ideally, the ordering in test should never be updated.
  @Test
  public void stableIncidentEdgeOrder_edges_returnsInStableOrder() {
    assume().that(graph.incidentEdgeOrder().type()).isEqualTo(ElementOrder.Type.STABLE);

   *
   * <p>The returned object is serializable if this object is serializable.
   *
   * @since 10.0
   */
  public final <S extends @Nullable T> Equivalence<Iterable<S>> pairwise() {
    // Ideally, the returned equivalence would support Iterable<? extends T>. However,
    // the need for this is so rare that it's not worth making callers deal with the ugly wildcard.
    return new PairwiseEquivalence<>(this);
  }

   *
   * <p>The returned object is serializable if this object is serializable.
   *
   * @since 10.0
   */
  public final <S extends @Nullable T> Equivalence<Iterable<S>> pairwise() {
    // Ideally, the returned equivalence would support Iterable<? extends T>. However,
    // the need for this is so rare that it's not worth making callers deal with the ugly wildcard.
    return new PairwiseEquivalence<>(this);
  }