assertTrue(createIndexResponse.isAcknowledged());
    }

    private static void initializeSuggestSettings() throws Exception {
        // Create suggester and get settings
        Suggester suggester = Suggester.builder().build(client, "test");
        settings = suggester.settings();

        // Store analyzer settings
        storeAnalyzerSettings();
    }

     * @return JSON response containing list of stemmer override dictionary items
     */
    // GET /api/admin/dict/stemmerOverride/settings/{dictId}
    @Execute
    public JsonResponse<ApiResult> get$settings(final String dictId, final SearchBody body) {
        body.dictId = dictId;
        validateApi(body, messages -> {});
        final StemmerOverridePager pager = copyBeanToNewBean(body, StemmerOverridePager.class);

    public val pushPromises: List<PushPromise>
      get() = pushPromises_.toList()

    private val settings_: Settings
    public val settings: Settings
      get() = Settings().apply { merge(settings_) }

    public constructor() {
      this.inTunnel = false
      this.informationalResponses_ = mutableListOf()
      this.status = "HTTP/1.1 200 OK"
      this.bodyVar = null

{* ../../docs_src/settings/app03_an_py39/main.py hl[1,11] *}

Then for any subsequent call of `get_settings()` in the dependencies for the next requests, instead of executing the internal code of `get_settings()` and creating a new `Settings` object, it will return the same object that was returned on the first call, again and again.

#### `lru_cache` Technical Details { #lru-cache-technical-details }

        final Settings settings = response.getIndexToSettings().get(analyzerSettingsIndexName);
        final Settings analyzerSettings = settings.getAsSettings("index.analysis.analyzer");
        return analyzerSettings.getAsGroups().keySet();
    }

    /**
     * Get field analyzer mapping.
     * @return Field analyzer mapping
     */

{* ../../docs_src/settings/app03_an_py39/main.py hl[1,11] *}

Dann wird bei allen nachfolgenden Aufrufen von `get_settings()`, in den Abhängigkeiten für darauffolgende Requests, dasselbe Objekt zurückgegeben, das beim ersten Aufruf zurückgegeben wurde, anstatt den Code von `get_settings()` erneut auszuführen und ein neues `Settings`-Objekt zu erstellen.

#### Technische Details zu `lru_cache`

{* ../../docs_src/settings/app03_an_py39/main.py hl[1,11] *}

Entonces, para cualquier llamada subsiguiente de `get_settings()` en las dependencias de los próximos requests, en lugar de ejecutar el código interno de `get_settings()` y crear un nuevo objeto `Settings`, devolverá el mismo objeto que fue devuelto en la primera llamada, una y otra vez.

#### Detalles Técnicos de `lru_cache`

🚥 🔗 🔢 💖:

```Python
def get_settings():
    return Settings()
```

👥 🔜 ✍ 👈 🎚 🔠 📨, & 👥 🔜 👂 `.env` 📁 🔠 📨. 👶 👶

✋️ 👥 ⚙️ `@lru_cache` 👨‍🎨 🔛 🔝, `Settings` 🎚 🔜 ✍ 🕴 🕐, 🥇 🕰 ⚫️ 🤙. 👶 👶

{* ../../docs_src/settings/app03/main.py hl[1,10] *}

            }
            final HttpServletResponse response = LaResponseUtil.getResponse();
            try {
                final Auth auth = new Auth(getSettings(), request, response);
                final Saml2Settings settings = auth.getSettings();
                settings.setSPValidationOnly(true);
                final String metadata = settings.getSPMetadata();

{* ../../docs_src/settings/app03_an_py39/main.py hl[1,11] *}

Dessa forma, todas as chamadas da função `get_settings()` nas dependências das próximas requisições, em vez de executar o código interno de `get_settings()` e instanciar um novo objeto `Settings`, irão retornar o mesmo objeto que foi retornado na primeira chamada, de novo e de novo.

#### Detalhes Técnicos de `lru_cache`