The most common is the implicit flow.

The most secure is the code flow, but it's more complex to implement as it requires more steps. As it is more complex, many providers end up suggesting the implicit flow.

/// note

It's common that each authentication provider names their flows in a different way, to make it part of their brand.

      if (outFinished) {
        this.sink.finished = true
        notifyAll() // Because doReadTimeout() may have changed.
      }
    }

    // Only DATA frames are subject to flow-control. Transmit the HEADER frame if the connection
    // flow-control window is fully depleted.
    if (!flushHeaders) {
      withLock {
        flushHeaders = (connection.writeBytesTotal >= connection.writeBytesMaximum)
      }
    }

Am häufigsten ist der „Implicit“-Flow.

Am sichersten ist der „Code“-Flow, die Implementierung ist jedoch komplexer, da mehr Schritte erforderlich sind. Da er komplexer ist, schlagen viele Anbieter letztendlich den „Implicit“-Flow vor.

/// note | Hinweis

  static final Iterable<Integer> ALL_INTEGER_CANDIDATES;

  static {
    ImmutableSet.Builder<Integer> intValues = ImmutableSet.builder();
    // Add boundary values manually to avoid over/under flow (this covers 2^N for 0 and 31).
    intValues.add(Integer.MAX_VALUE - 1, Integer.MAX_VALUE);
    // Add values up to 40. This covers cases like "square of a prime" and such.
    for (int i = 1; i <= 40; i++) {

## `username` und `password` entgegennehmen

Wir werden **FastAPIs** Sicherheits-Werkzeuge verwenden, um den `username` und das `password` entgegenzunehmen.

OAuth2 spezifiziert, dass der Client/Benutzer bei Verwendung des „Password Flow“ (den wir verwenden) die Felder `username` und `password` als Formulardaten senden muss.

        SuggestCreator.Options options = new SuggestCreator.Options();
        assertNotNull(options);
    }

    // Test create and purge full flow
    public void test_createAndPurge_fullFlow() {
        // Test full flow of create and purge
        SuggestCreator.Options options = new SuggestCreator.Options();
        assertNotNull(options);
    }

    // Test system property setting

 */
@ExtendWith(MockitoExtension.class)
class SmbWatchHandleImplTest {

    @Mock
    SmbFileHandleImpl handle;

    @Mock
    SmbTreeHandleImpl tree;

    // Prepare SMB2 flow with a given response
    private void setupSmb2(NotifyResponse resp, byte[] fileId) throws Exception {
        when(handle.isValid()).thenReturn(true);
        when(handle.getTree()).thenReturn(tree);

  /** Settings we communicate to the peer. */
  val okHttpSettings =
    Settings().apply {
      // Flow control was designed more for servers, or proxies than edge clients. If we are a client,
      // set the flow control window to 16MiB.  This avoids thrashing window updates every 64KiB, yet
      // small enough to avoid blowing up the heap.
      if (builder.client) {

        String logoutUrl = "https://sso.example.com/logout";
        authenticator.setLogoutUrl(logoutUrl);

        // Execute authentication flow
        LoginCredential loginResult = authenticator.getLoginCredential();
        assertNotNull(loginResult);

        TestLoginCredentialResolver resolver = new TestLoginCredentialResolver();

 * of EventBus may be better written using <a
 * href="https://kotlinlang.org/docs/coroutines-guide.html">Kotlin coroutines</a>, including <a
 * href="https://kotlinlang.org/docs/flow.html">Flow</a> and <a
 * href="https://kotlinlang.org/docs/channels.html">Channels</a>. Yet other usages are better served
 * by individual libraries that provide specialized support for particular use cases.
 *