identifiers.put(ident, method);
          }
        }
      }
    }
    return ImmutableList.copyOf(identifiers.values());
  }

  /** Global cache of classes to their flattened hierarchy of supertypes. */
  private static final LoadingCache<Class<?>, ImmutableSet<Class<?>>> flattenHierarchyCache =
      CacheBuilder.newBuilder()
          .weakKeys()
          .build(

      try {
        new NullPointerTester().testMethodParameter(new OneArg(), method, 0);
      } catch (AssertionError unexpected) {
        throw new AssertionError("Should not have flagged method " + methodName, unexpected);
      }
    }
  }

  public void testStaticOneArgMethodsThatShouldFail() throws Exception {
    for (String methodName : STATIC_ONE_ARG_METHODS_SHOULD_FAIL) {

   *   <li>{@code [3..6]} encloses {@code [4..4)} (even though the latter is empty)
   *   <li>{@code (3..6]} does not enclose {@code [3..6]}
   *   <li>{@code [4..5]} does not enclose {@code (3..6)} (even though it contains every value
   *       contained by the latter range)
   *   <li>{@code [3..6]} does not enclose {@code (1..1]} (even though it contains every value
   *       contained by the latter range)
   * </ul>
   *

  }

  /*
   * Under Android, MyError propagates up and fails the test?
   *
   * TODO(b/218700094): Does this matter to prod users, or is it just a feature of our testing
   * environment? If the latter, maybe write a custom Executor that avoids failing the test when it
   * sees an Error?
   */
  @AndroidIncompatible
  public void testTaskThrowsError() throws Exception {
    class MyError extends Error {}

  }

  /*
   * Under Android, MyError propagates up and fails the test?
   *
   * TODO(b/218700094): Does this matter to prod users, or is it just a feature of our testing
   * environment? If the latter, maybe write a custom Executor that avoids failing the test when it
   * sees an Error?
   */
  @AndroidIncompatible
  public void testTaskThrowsError() throws Exception {
    class MyError extends Error {}

   * 9.0], [9.0, 10.0] (and so on), no matter what the function is. This guarantees that we handle
   * correctly requests of varying weight (permits), /no matter/ what the actual function is - so we
   * can tweak the latter freely. (The only requirement, obviously, is that we can compute its
   * integrals).
   *
   * Note well that if, for this function, we chose a horizontal line, at height of exactly (1/QPS),

   * execute/submit}, as in {@link CallerRunsPolicy} This applies both to individually submitted
   * tasks and to collections of tasks submitted via {@code invokeAll} or {@code invokeAny}. In the
   * latter case, tasks will run serially on the calling thread. Tasks are run to completion before
   * a {@code Future} is returned to the caller (unless the executor has been shutdown).
   *

modification follow.  Pay close attention to the difference between a
"work based on the library" and a "work that uses the library".  The
former contains code derived from the library, whereas the latter must
be combined with the library in order to run.

                  GNU LESSER GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
   TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION

     * the current count of the element in the multiset, depending on the implementation. Note that
     * in the former case, this method can never return zero, while in the latter, it will return
     * zero if all occurrences of the element were since removed from the multiset.
     *
     * @return the count of the element; never negative
     */
    int getCount();

    /**

     * the current count of the element in the multiset, depending on the implementation. Note that
     * in the former case, this method can never return zero, while in the latter, it will return
     * zero if all occurrences of the element were since removed from the multiset.
     *
     * @return the count of the element; never negative
     */
    int getCount();

    /**