*
   * Response header values like `Location` and `Retry-After` are also considered.
   *
   * Client configuration may be used to make follow-up decisions, such as:
   *
   *  * [OkHttpClient.followRedirects] must be true to follow redirects.
   *  * [OkHttpClient.followSslRedirects] must be true to follow redirects that add or remove HTTPS.
   *  * [OkHttpClient.authenticator] must respond to an authorization challenge.
   *

        /*
         * The (tooLow + 1, tooHigh) arguments below would be invalid because tooLow would be
         * greater than tooHigh.
         */
        return ContiguousSet.create(Range.openClosed(0, 1), DiscreteDomain.integers()).subSet(0, 1);
      }
      int tooHigh = set.last() + 1;
      int tooLow = set.first() - 1;
      set.add(tooHigh);
      set.add(tooLow);

* News about FastAPI and friends 🚀
* Guides 📝
* Features ✨
* Breaking changes 🚨
* Tips and tricks ✅

## Follow FastAPI on X (Twitter) { #follow-fastapi-on-x-twitter }

<a href="https://x.com/fastapi" class="external-link" target="_blank">Follow @fastapi on **X (Twitter)**</a> to get the latest news about **FastAPI**. 🐦

## Star **FastAPI** in GitHub { #star-fastapi-in-github }

    return true
  }

  /**
   * Figures out the HTTP request to make in response to receiving [userResponse]. This will
   * either add authentication headers, follow redirects or handle a client request timeout. If a
   * follow-up is either unnecessary or not applicable, this returns null.
   */
  @Throws(IOException::class)
  private fun followUpRequest(
    userResponse: Response,
    exchange: Exchange?,

  }

  boolean isEmpty() {
    // The casts are safe because of the has*Bound() checks.
    return (hasUpperBound() && tooLow(uncheckedCastNullableTToT(getUpperEndpoint())))
        || (hasLowerBound() && tooHigh(uncheckedCastNullableTToT(getLowerEndpoint())));
  }

  boolean tooLow(@ParametricNullness T t) {
    if (!hasLowerBound()) {
      return false;
    }

  }

  boolean isEmpty() {
    // The casts are safe because of the has*Bound() checks.
    return (hasUpperBound() && tooLow(uncheckedCastNullableTToT(getUpperEndpoint())))
        || (hasLowerBound() && tooHigh(uncheckedCastNullableTToT(getLowerEndpoint())));
  }

  boolean tooLow(@ParametricNullness T t) {
    if (!hasLowerBound()) {
      return false;
    }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("All fragment flags should have unique values")
        void testFragmentFlagsUniqueness() {
            // Verify that fragment flags are unique and follow bit pattern
            assertEquals(1, Integer.bitCount(DcerpcConstants.DCERPC_FIRST_FRAG), "DCERPC_FIRST_FRAG should be a single bit");

      requestBody.close()
      assertThat(responseBody.readUtf8Line()).isNull()
    }
    body.awaitSuccess()
  }

  /**
   * Duplex calls that have follow-ups are weird. By the time we know there's a follow-up we've
   * already split off another thread to stream the request body. Because we permit at most one
   * exchange at a time we break the request stream out from under that writer.
   */
  @Test

3. **Follow** the coding standards: `mvn formatter:format`
4. **Add** comprehensive tests for new functionality
5. **Commit** your changes: `git commit -m 'Add amazing feature'`
6. **Push** to the branch: `git push origin feature/amazing-feature`
7. **Submit** a Pull Request with detailed description

### Code Standards
- Follow the project's Eclipse formatter configuration

   *
   * We get plan0 and plan1 from the route planner.
   * We get plan2 as a follow-up to plan1, typically retry the same IP but different TLS.
   * We get plan3 as a retry of plan0, which was canceled when it lost the race.
   *
   * This test confirms that we prefer to do the TLS follow-up (plan2) before the TCP retry (plan3).
   * It also confirms we enforce the 250 ms delay in each race.
   */
  @Test