int num_dims = output_shapes->items[0].num_dims;
    int64_t* dims = output_shapes->items[0].dims;

    if (!expected_shape.has_value()) {
      EXPECT_EQ(num_dims, -1);
      EXPECT_EQ(dims, nullptr);
      return;
    }

    EXPECT_EQ(num_dims, expected_shape->size());
    for (size_t i = 0; i < num_dims; ++i) {
      EXPECT_EQ(dims[i], (*expected_shape)[i]);
    }

    std::vector<DimensionHandle> dims;
    const TF_ShapeAndType& input_shape = input_shapes->items[i];
    if (input_shape.num_dims == InferenceContext::kUnknownRank) {
      c.SetInput(i, c.UnknownShape());
      continue;
    }
    dims.reserve(input_shape.num_dims);
    for (int j = 0; j < input_shape.num_dims; ++j) {
      dims.push_back(c.MakeDim(input_shape.dims[j]));
    }
    c.SetInput(i, c.MakeShape(dims));

    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_nonNegative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 16;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isAtLeast(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_nonNegative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 16;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isAtLeast(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_nonNegative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 16;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isAtLeast(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

TF_CAPI_EXPORT extern TF_DataType TF_CheckpointReaderGetVariableDataType(
    TF_CheckpointReader* reader, const char* name);
// Read the shape of a variable and write to `dims`
TF_CAPI_EXPORT extern void TF_CheckpointReaderGetVariableShape(
    TF_CheckpointReader* reader, const char* name, int64_t* dims, int num_dims,
    TF_Status* status);
// Get the number of dimension of a variable
TF_CAPI_EXPORT extern int TF_CheckpointReaderGetVariableNumDims(

    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_nonNegative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 16;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isAtLeast(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_nonNegative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 16;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isAtLeast(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_nonNegative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 16;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isAtLeast(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_nonNegative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 16;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isAtLeast(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }