*   notBefore      Time,
   *   notAfter       Time
   * }
   * ```
   */
  private val validity: BasicDerAdapter<Validity> =
    Adapters.sequence(
      "Validity",
      time,
      time,
      decompose = {
        listOf(
          it.notBefore,
          it.notAfter,
        )
      },
      construct = {
        Validity(
          notBefore = it[0] as Long,
          notAfter = it[1] as Long,

   *
   * TODO: for sets, sort by tag when encoding.
   * TODO: for set ofs, sort by encoded value when encoding.
   */
  fun <T> sequence(
    name: String,
    vararg members: DerAdapter<*>,
    decompose: (T) -> List<*>,
    construct: (List<*>) -> T,
  ): BasicDerAdapter<T> {
    val codec =
      object : BasicDerAdapter.Codec<T> {
        override fun decode(reader: DerReader): T {

      val ADAPTER =
        Adapters.sequence(
          "Point",
          Adapters.INTEGER_AS_LONG.withTag(tag = 0L).optional(),
          Adapters.INTEGER_AS_LONG.withTag(tag = 1L).optional(),
          decompose = { listOf(it.x, it.y) },
          construct = { Point(it[0] as Long?, it[1] as Long?) },
        )
    }
  }

  private fun date(s: String): Date =
    SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSSZ").run {

 *  Breaking: Rename `RecordedRequest.path` to `RecordedRequest.target`. (This property is
    _sometimes_ a path, but it can also be a path and query, or a full URL.)

 *  Breaking: Decompose the `RecordedRequest.requestLine` into three properties, `method`, `target`,
    and `version`. This better suits HTTP/2 where the request line had to be synthesized from
    component headers.

    Function<? super String, Integer> g = new HashCodeFunction();
    Function<Float, String> f = Functions.forMap(m, "F");

    Function<Float, Boolean> c1 = Functions.compose(Functions.compose(h, g), f);
    Function<Float, Boolean> c2 = Functions.compose(h, Functions.compose(g, f));

    // Might be nice (eventually) to have:
    //     assertEquals(c1, c2);

    // But for now, settle for this:

            composeExtension.setExecutable(
                project.file("/usr/local/bin/docker-compose").exists() ? "/usr/local/bin/docker-compose" : "/usr/bin/docker-compose"
            );

            tasks.named("composeUp").configure(t -> {
                // Avoid running docker-compose tasks in parallel in CI due to some issues on certain Linux distributions
                if (BuildParams.isCi()) {

    Function<? super String, Integer> g = new HashCodeFunction();
    Function<Float, String> f = Functions.forMap(m, "F");

    Function<Float, Boolean> c1 = Functions.compose(Functions.compose(h, g), f);
    Function<Float, Boolean> c2 = Functions.compose(h, Functions.compose(g, f));

    // Might be nice (eventually) to have:
    //     assertEquals(c1, c2);

    // But for now, settle for this:

    private static String[] DOCKER_BINARIES = { "/usr/bin/docker", "/usr/local/bin/docker" };
    private static String[] DOCKER_COMPOSE_BINARIES = { "/usr/local/bin/docker-compose", "/usr/bin/docker-compose" };
    private static final Version MINIMUM_DOCKER_VERSION = Version.fromString("17.05.0");

    private final ExecOperations execOperations;
    private DockerAvailability dockerAvailability;

    @Inject

#### Docker Compose { #docker-compose }

Вы можете развёртывать на **одном сервере** (не кластере) с **Docker Compose**, и у вас не будет простого способа управлять репликацией контейнеров (в Docker Compose), сохраняя общую сеть и **балансировку нагрузки**.

#### Docker Compose { #docker-compose }

You could be deploying to a **single server** (not a cluster) with **Docker Compose**, so you wouldn't have an easy way to manage replication of containers (with Docker Compose) while preserving the shared network and **load balancing**.