*     the array
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code array} is empty
   */
  @GwtIncompatible(
      "Available in GWT! Annotation is to avoid conflict with GWT specialization of base class.")
  public static short min(short... array) {
    checkArgument(array.length > 0);
    short min = array[0];
    for (int i = 1; i < array.length; i++) {

   *     the array
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code array} is empty
   */
  @GwtIncompatible(
      "Available in GWT! Annotation is to avoid conflict with GWT specialization of base class.")
  public static short min(short... array) {
    checkArgument(array.length > 0);
    short min = array[0];
    for (int i = 1; i < array.length; i++) {

   *     the array
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code array} is empty
   */
  @GwtIncompatible(
      "Available in GWT! Annotation is to avoid conflict with GWT specialization of base class.")
  public static int min(int... array) {
    checkArgument(array.length > 0);
    int min = array[0];
    for (int i = 1; i < array.length; i++) {
      if (array[i] < min) {

   *     the array
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code array} is empty
   */
  @GwtIncompatible(
      "Available in GWT! Annotation is to avoid conflict with GWT specialization of base class.")
  public static float min(float... array) {
    checkArgument(array.length > 0);
    float min = array[0];
    for (int i = 1; i < array.length; i++) {

   *     the array
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code array} is empty
   */
  @GwtIncompatible(
      "Available in GWT! Annotation is to avoid conflict with GWT specialization of base class.")
  public static double min(double... array) {
    checkArgument(array.length > 0);
    double min = array[0];
    for (int i = 1; i < array.length; i++) {

     * platforms we target.
     *
     * 2. Kotlin's Map type has a getOrDefault method that accepts and returns a "plain V," in
     * contrast to the "V?" type that we're using. As a result, Kotlin sees a conflict between the
     * nullness annotations in ImmutableMap and those in its own Map type. In response, it considers
     * the parameter and return type both to be platform types. As a result, Kotlin permits calls

     * platforms we target.
     *
     * 2. Kotlin's Map type has a getOrDefault method that accepts and returns a "plain V," in
     * contrast to the "V?" type that we're using. As a result, Kotlin sees a conflict between the
     * nullness annotations in ImmutableMap and those in its own Map type. In response, it considers
     * the parameter and return type both to be platform types. As a result, Kotlin permits calls

ventDefault(),f._jQueryInterface.call(n.default(this),"load")})),n.default((function(){n.default(r).each((function(){f._jQueryInterface.call(n.default(this))}))})),n.default.fn[i]=f._jQueryInterface,n.default.fn[i].Constructor=f,n.default.fn[i].noConflict=function(){return n.default.fn[i]=l,f._jQueryInterface};var u="CardWidget",c="lte.cardwidget",h=n.default.fn[u],g="card",p="collapsed-card",m="collapsing-card",v="expanding-card",_="was-collapsed",b="maximized-card",y='[data-card-widget="remove...

        }
    }

    public void test_destroyContainer() throws Exception {
        // Test destroyContainer method - skip this test as it conflicts with container management
        // The test framework manages the container lifecycle
        assertTrue(true);
    }

    public void test_process_cleanupMode() throws Exception {

    lock03 = factory3.newReentrantLock(OtherOrder.THIRD);
  }

  // In the unittest, create each ordered factory with its own set of lock
  // graph nodes (as opposed to using the static per-Enum map) to avoid
  // conflicts across different test runs.
  private <E extends Enum<E>>
      CycleDetectingLockFactory.WithExplicitOrdering<E> newInstanceWithExplicitOrdering(
          Class<E> enumClass, Policy policy) {