func new(Type) *Type

// The complex built-in function constructs a complex value from two
// floating-point values. The real and imaginary parts must be of the same
// size, either float32 or float64 (or assignable to them), and the return
// value will be the corresponding complex type (complex64 for float32,
// complex128 for float64).
func complex(r, i FloatType) ComplexType

        NtlmHttpURLConnection spiedConnection = spy(ntlmConnection);
        doNothing().when(spiedConnection).connect();
        // Mock the handshake process to do nothing complex
        mockResponse(HTTP_OK, "OK", null, null);

        // Act & Assert
        assertDoesNotThrow(() -> spiedConnection.getResponseCode());
        // Use reflection to verify handshake method is called

        // data1 should also be modified (same object)
        assertEquals("https://modified.com", data1.getUrl());
    }

    public void test_complexScenarioWithGet() {
        // Test complex scenario with GET method
        RequestData data = RequestDataBuilder.newRequestData().get().url("https://api.example.com/users/123").weight(0.8f).build();

        assertEquals(Method.GET, data.getMethod());

For example, a compiler must not discard <code>i</code> and reload it
a second time from <code>*p</code> in this program:
</p>

<pre>
i := *p
if i &lt; 0 || i &gt;= len(funcs) {
	panic("invalid function index")
}
... complex code ...
// compiler must NOT reload i = *p here
funcs[i]()
</pre>

<p>

## Recap { #recap }

With what you have seen up to now, you can set up a secure **FastAPI** application using standards like OAuth2 and JWT.

In almost any framework handling the security becomes a rather complex subject quite quickly.

 *   <li>network/transfer errors</li>
 *   <li>file system errors: permissions</li>
 * </ul>
 *
 * TODO carlos: all these possible has*Exceptions and get*Exceptions methods make the clients too
 *       complex requiring a long list of checks, need to create a parent/interface/encapsulation
 *       for the types of exceptions
 */
@Deprecated
public class ArtifactResolutionResult {

    String SELF_COMBINATION_REMOVE = XmlService.SELF_COMBINATION_REMOVE;

    /**
     * In case of complex XML structures, combining can be done based on id.
     */
    @Deprecated(since = "4.0.0", forRemoval = true)
    String ID_COMBINATION_MODE_ATTRIBUTE = XmlService.ID_COMBINATION_MODE_ATTRIBUTE;

    /**
     * In case of complex XML structures, combining can be done based on keys.
     * This is a comma separated list of attribute names.

        String result = data.toString();
        assertNotNull(result);
        assertTrue(result.contains("ExtractData"));
    }

    public void test_complexScenario() {
        // Test complex scenario with multiple operations
        ExtractData data = new ExtractData();

        // Set content

The most common is the implicit flow.

The most secure is the code flow, but it's more complex to implement as it requires more steps. As it is more complex, many providers end up suggesting the implicit flow.

/// note

It's common that each authentication provider names their flows in a different way, to make it part of their brand.

            // Verify overwrite
            assertEquals(concreteImplementation, cacheMap.get(key));
            assertNotEquals(oldEntry, cacheMap.get(key));
        }
    }

    @Nested
    @DisplayName("Complex Scenarios Tests")
    class ComplexScenariosTests {

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should handle multiple fixup operations")
        void testMultipleFixupOperations() {