private void countRemaps(long h, AtomicLongMap<Integer> map) {
    int last = 0;
    for (int shards = 2; shards <= MAX_SHARDS; shards++) {
      int chosen = Hashing.consistentHash(h, shards);
      if (chosen != last) {
        map.incrementAndGet(shards);
        last = chosen;
      }
    }
  }

  private static final int ITERS = 10000;
  private static final int MAX_SHARDS = 500;

//
// -- if input is RRS but RRS is not configured/initialized '-1' parity
//
//	for RRS is assumed, the caller is expected to choose the right parity
//	at that point.
//
// -- if input is STANDARD but STANDARD is not configured/initialized '-1' parity
//
//	is returned, the caller is expected to choose the right parity
//	at that point.
func (sCfg *Config) GetParityForSC(sc string) (parity int) {
	ConfigLock.RLock()

	return accessKey, secretKey, nil
}

// GenerateAccessKey returns a new access key generated randomly using
// the given io.Reader. If random is nil, crypto/rand.Reader is used.
// If length <= 0, the access key length is chosen automatically.
//
// GenerateAccessKey returns an error if length is too small for a valid
// access key.
func GenerateAccessKey(length int, random io.Reader) (string, error) {
	if random == nil {

   *
   * <p>We have chosen this approach over at least two alternatives:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>We could change the serialization of this class incompatibly. We have reserved the right
   *       to make such changes to our serialized forms, and we have made them before, usually
   *       without trouble. In this case, my guess is that our chosen approach is even less likely

Upgrading to OkHttp 4
=====================

OkHttp 4.x upgrades our implementation language from Java to Kotlin and keeps everything else the
same. We’ve chosen Kotlin because it gives us powerful new capabilities while integrating closely
with Java.

We spent a lot of time and energy on retaining strict compatibility with OkHttp 3.x. We’re even
keeping the package name the same: `okhttp3`!

There are three kinds of compatibility we’re tracking:

    //     we find them, regardless of what the address policies need.
    //
    //  2. EVICTABLE: Connections not required by any address policy. This matches connections that
    //     don't participate in any policy, plus connections whose policies won't be violated if the
    //     connection is closed. We only close these if the idle connection limit is exceeded.
    //

   *
   * <p>We have chosen this approach over at least two alternatives:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>We could change the serialization of this class incompatibly. We have reserved the right
   *       to make such changes to our serialized forms, and we have made them before, usually
   *       without trouble. In this case, my guess is that our chosen approach is even less likely

                parser.nextTag();
            }
            return "";
        }

        final Object bean = newImplementation(clazz);

        // build map of all known bean properties belonging to the chosen implementation
        final Map<String, BeanProperty<Object>> propertyMap = new HashMap<>();
        for (final BeanProperty<Object> property : new BeanProperties(clazz)) {
            final String name = property.getName();

		} else {
			tw.hdr.Typeflag = TypeReg
		}
	}

	// Round ModTime and ignore AccessTime and ChangeTime unless
	// the format is explicitly chosen.
	// This ensures nominal usage of WriteHeader (without specifying the format)
	// does not always result in the PAX format being chosen, which
	// causes a 1KiB increase to every header.
	if tw.hdr.Format == FormatUnknown {
		tw.hdr.ModTime = tw.hdr.ModTime.Round(time.Second)

	11, ':', 'e', 'v', 'e', 'n', 't', '-', 't', 'y', 'p', 'e', 7, 0, 7, 'R', 'e', 'c', 'o', 'r', 'd', 's',
}

const (
	// Chosen for compatibility with AWS JAVA SDK
	// It has a buffer size of 128K:
	// https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-java/blob/master/aws-java-sdk-s3/src/main/java/com/amazonaws/services/s3/internal/eventstreaming/MessageDecoder.java#L26