before.assertRun();
    inBetween.assertRun();
    after.assertRun();
  }

  public void testListenLaterSetAsynchronouslyLaterDelegateFailed() {
    CountingRunnable before = new CountingRunnable();
    CountingRunnable inBetween = new CountingRunnable();
    CountingRunnable after = new CountingRunnable();

    future.addListener(before, directExecutor());

which are unordered by happens before
(that is, neither <i>r</i> happens before <i>w</i>
nor <i>w</i> happens before <i>r</i>).
</p>

<p>
A <i>write-write data race</i> on memory location <i>x</i>
consists of two write-like memory operations <i>w</i> and <i>w'</i> on <i>x</i>,
at least one of which is non-synchronizing,
which are unordered by happens before.
</p>

<p>

    long newValue = random.nextInt(MAX_ADDEND);
    for (int i = 0; i < ITERATIONS; i++) {
      long before = map.get(key);
      long result = map.putIfAbsent(key, newValue);
      long after = map.get(key);
      assertEquals(before, result);
      assertEquals(before == 0 ? newValue : before, after);

      map.remove(key);
      before = map.get(key);
      result = map.putIfAbsent(key, newValue);
      after = map.get(key);

        Metadata source = createMetadataFromArtifact(artifact);
        Date before = new Date(System.currentTimeMillis() - 5000);
        Date after = new Date(System.currentTimeMillis());
        addSnapshotVersion(target.getVersioning(), "jar", before, "1", 1);
        SnapshotVersion sv2 =

    before.assertRun();
    inBetween.assertRun();
    after.assertRun();
  }

  public void testListenLaterSetAsynchronouslyLaterDelegateFailed() {
    CountingRunnable before = new CountingRunnable();
    CountingRunnable inBetween = new CountingRunnable();
    CountingRunnable after = new CountingRunnable();

    future.addListener(before, directExecutor());

  // Why 1000?  WHY NOT!
  private static final int MAX_BUSY_WAIT_SPINS = 1000;

  @Override
  public final void run() {
    /*
     * Set runner thread before checking isDone(). If we were to check isDone() first, the task
     * might be cancelled before we set the runner thread. That would make it impossible to
     * interrupt, yet it will still run, since interruptTask will leave the runner value null,

 * cancelled).
 *
 * <p>This class serializes execution of <i>submitted</i> tasks but not any <i>listeners</i> of
 * those tasks.
 *
 * <p>Submitted tasks have a happens-before order as defined in the Java Language Specification.
 * Tasks execute with the same happens-before order that the function calls to {@link #submit} and
 * {@link #submitAsync} that submitted those tasks had.
 *

	}

	p2.Code = "dont_save"
	if DB.Save(&p2).Error == nil {
		t.Fatalf("An error from before save callbacks happened when update with invalid value")
	}

	p3 := Product{Code: "dont_delete", Price: 100}
	DB.Save(&p3)
	if DB.Delete(&p3).Error == nil {
		t.Fatalf("An error from before delete callbacks happened when delete")
	}

   * is also performed for calls to {@link Object#equals}, {@link Object#hashCode}, and {@link
   * Object#toString}.
   *
   * <p>If the target method call finishes before the limit is reached, the return value or
   * exception is propagated to the caller exactly as-is. If, on the other hand, the time limit is
   * reached, the proxy will attempt to abort the call to the target, and will throw an {@link

 * cancelled).
 *
 * <p>This class serializes execution of <i>submitted</i> tasks but not any <i>listeners</i> of
 * those tasks.
 *
 * <p>Submitted tasks have a happens-before order as defined in the Java Language Specification.
 * Tasks execute with the same happens-before order that the function calls to {@link #submit} and
 * {@link #submitAsync} that submitted those tasks had.
 *