.add("WWW-Authenticate: Basic realm=\"protected area\"")
        .build()
    assertThat(headers.parseChallenges("WWW-Authenticate"))
      .isEqualTo(listOf(Challenge("Basic", mapOf("realm" to "protected area"))))
  }

  @Test fun basicChallengeWithCharset() {
    val headers =
      Headers.Builder()
        .add("WWW-Authenticate: Basic realm=\"protected area\", charset=\"UTF-8\"")
        .build()

        "w": 6,
        "x": 0,
        "y": 3
      },
      "id": 20,
      "links": [],
      "maxDataPoints": 100,
      "options": {
        "colorMode": "none",
        "graphMode": "area",
        "justifyMode": "auto",
        "orientation": "horizontal",
        "reduceOptions": {
          "calcs": [
            "mean"
          ],
          "fields": "",
          "values": false

   *
   * If we pick a function that goes /below/ that horizontal line, it means that we reduce the area
   * of the function, thus time. Thus, the RateLimiter becomes /faster/ after a period of
   * underutilization. If, on the other hand, we pick a function that goes /above/ that horizontal
   * line, then it means that the area (time) is increased, thus storedPermits are more costly than

\",\"language\":\"kuery\"},\"filter\":[],\"indexRefName\":\"kibanaSavedObjectMeta.searchSourceJSON.index\"}"},"title":"average-response-time","uiStateJSON":"{}","version":1,"visState":"{\"title\":\"average-response-time\",\"type\":\"area\",\"params\":{\"type\":\"area\",\"grid\":{\"categoryLines\":false},\"categoryAxes\":[{\"id\":\"CategoryAxis-1\",\"type\":\"category\",\"position\":\"bottom\",\"show\":true,\"style\":{},\"scale\":{\"type\":\"linear\"},\"labels\":{\"show\":true,\"truncate\":100},\...

                        getLogger().debug(metadata + " could not be found on repository: " + repository.getId());

                        // delete the local copy so the old details aren't used.
                        if (file.exists()) {
                            if (!file.delete()) {
                                // sleep for 10ms just in case this is windows holding a file lock

linters-settings:
  errcheck:
    # report about not checking of errors in type assertions: `a := b.(MyStruct)`;
    # default is false: such cases aren't reported by default.
    check-type-assertions: false
    # report about assignment of errors to blank identifier: `num, _ := strconv.Atoi(numStr)`;
    # default is false: such cases aren't reported by default.
    check-blank: false
  govet:
    disable:
      # report about shadowed variables
      - shadow

        Artifact artifact = getArtifact("c", res.getArtifacts());
        // local wins now, and irrelevant if not local as test/provided aren't transitive
        // assertEquals( Artifact.SCOPE_COMPILE, artifact.getArtifactScope(), "Check artifactScope" );
        assertEquals(Artifact.SCOPE_TEST, artifact.getScope(), "Check artifactScope");
    }

    @Test

    bytesA[4] = (byte) 0xbe;
    bytesB[4] = (byte) 0xef;

    HashCode hashCodeA = HashCode.fromBytes(bytesA);
    HashCode hashCodeB = HashCode.fromBytes(bytesB);

    // They aren't equal...
    assertFalse(hashCodeA.equals(hashCodeB));

    // But they still have the same Object#hashCode() value.
    // Technically not a violation of the equals/hashCode contract, but...?

   */
  private void testParameter(
      @Nullable Object instance, Invokable<?, ?> invokable, int paramIndex, Class<?> testedClass) {
    /*
     * com.google.common is starting to rely on type-use annotations, which aren't visible under
     * Android VMs and in open-source guava-android. So we skip testing there.
     */
    if (Reflection.getPackageName(testedClass).startsWith("com.google.common")) {
      return;
    }

   * FuturesGetChecked#getChecked(Future, Class)}, possibly using caching.
   *
   * <p>Uses reflection to gracefully fall back to when certain implementations aren't available.
   */
  @VisibleForTesting
  static class GetCheckedTypeValidatorHolder {
    static final GetCheckedTypeValidator BEST_VALIDATOR = getBestValidator();