}

  public void testToString() {
    // We can easily afford to test this exhaustively.
    for (int i = 0; i <= 0xff; i++) {
      assertThat(UnsignedBytes.toString((byte) i)).isEqualTo(Integer.toString(i));
    }
  }

  public void testToStringWithRadix() {
    // We can easily afford to test this exhaustively.

  }

  public void testToString() {
    // We can easily afford to test this exhaustively.
    for (int i = 0; i <= 0xff; i++) {
      assertThat(UnsignedBytes.toString((byte) i)).isEqualTo(Integer.toString(i));
    }
  }

  public void testToStringWithRadix() {
    // We can easily afford to test this exhaustively.

  using OpRewritePattern::OpRewritePattern;

  LogicalResult matchAndRewrite(TF::TensorListPopBackOp op,
                                PatternRewriter& rewriter) const override {
    // It is currently not possible to easily pack the output of a multi-result
    // op into an op with a single varidic output in `.td`.
    auto converted = rewriter.create<TFL::CustomOp>(
        op->getLoc(), op->getResultTypes(), op->getOperands(),

In GitHub, the template will guide you to write the right question so that you can more easily get a good answer, or even solve the problem yourself even before asking. And in GitHub I can make sure I always answer everything, even if it takes some time. I can't personally do that with the chat systems. 😅

 2. They can change the target ("delegate") of unqualified methods and properties.

Both are based on Groovy language features and we explain them in the following sections.

=== Block method signatures

You can easily identify a method as the implementation behind a block by its signature, or more specifically, its argument types. If a method corresponds to a block:

 * It must have at least one argument.

 *
 * <p>Java's baked-in concept of hash codes is constrained to 32 bits, and provides no separation
 * between hash algorithms and the data they act on, so alternate hash algorithms can't be easily
 * substituted. Also, implementations of {@code hashCode} tend to be poor-quality, in part because
 * they end up depending on <i>other</i> existing poor-quality {@code hashCode} implementations,

 *
 * <p>Java's baked-in concept of hash codes is constrained to 32 bits, and provides no separation
 * between hash algorithms and the data they act on, so alternate hash algorithms can't be easily
 * substituted. Also, implementations of {@code hashCode} tend to be poor-quality, in part because
 * they end up depending on <i>other</i> existing poor-quality {@code hashCode} implementations,

There are also tasks that allow you to publish to a single repository even when multiple ones are defined.
+
Note that the Maven Publish Plugin does not publish *source and Javadoc JARs* _by default_, but this can easily be activated as explained in <<building_java_projects.adoc#sec:java_packaging,the guide for building java projects>>.

[[migmvn:automatic_conversion]]
== Performing an automatic conversion

 * information among plugins, is this more like an extension point - do we need a sort of bus for
 * application data - do we need a dictionary for our applications like Apple does. We could easily
 * hook into this and this is the model we need to follow - how many of our REST services do not map
 * directory to a method in the application interface?
 *
 * - research extension points versus plugins
 *

}

// GCActive traces a GCActive event.
//
// Must be emitted by an actively running goroutine on an active P. This restriction can be changed
// easily and only depends on where it's currently called.
func (tl traceLocker) GCActive() {
	tl.eventWriter(traceGoRunning, traceProcRunning).commit(traceEvGCActive, traceArg(trace.seqGC))