* During code reviews that introduce new APIs, reviewers need to be mindful that all new properties are implemented with lazy types.

        )

        if pr.state == "open" and awaiting_label in label_strs:
            logging.info(
                f"This PR seems to be a language translation and awaiting reviews: #{pr.number}"
            )
            if already_notified_comment:
                logging.info(
                    f"This PR #{pr.number} was already notified in comment: {already_notified_comment.url}"

* Add the specific language label.
* Add the label `awaiting-review`.

The label `awaiting-review` is special, only used for translations. A GitHub Action will detect it, then it will read the language label, and it will update the GitHub Discussions managing the translations for that language to notify people that there's a new translation to review.

Because:

* While the code review process is likely very educational, it can take wildly
varying amounts of time depending on who is available, where the change is, and
how deep the change is. There is no way to predict how long it will take unless
we rush.
* We do not rush reviews without a very, very good reason. Class deadlines
aren't a good enough reason for us to rush reviews.

/// tip

Check the docs about [adding a pull request review](https://help.github.com/en/github/collaborating-with-issues-and-pull-requests/about-pull-request-reviews) to approve it or request changes.

///

    non-backward-compatible API changes without a major release. Reviewers of
    your pull request will comment on any API compatibility issues
    [following API review practices](https://github.com/tensorflow/community/blob/master/governance/api-reviews.md).
*   When you contribute a new feature to TensorFlow, the maintenance burden is
    (by default) transferred to the TensorFlow team. This means that the benefit

    return None

  print('You have Clang %s installed.\n' % curr_version)
  return curr_version


# Disable clang extension that rejects type definitions within offsetof.
# This was added in clang-16 by https://reviews.llvm.org/D133574.
# Still required for clang-17.
# Can be removed once upb is updated, since a type definition is used within
# offset of in the current version of ubp. See

* Suggest a new **feature**.

**Note**: if you do it, then I'm going to ask you to also help others. 😉

## Review Pull Requests { #review-pull-requests }

You can help me review pull requests from others.

Again, please try your best to be kind. 🤗

---

Here's what to keep in mind and how to review a pull request:

### Understand the problem { #understand-the-problem }

   * the first are ignored.
   */
  public static <E> ImmutableSet<E> of(E e1, E e2) {
    return new RegularSetBuilderImpl<E>(2).add(e1).add(e2).review().build();
  }

  /**
   * Returns an immutable set containing the given elements, minus duplicates, in the order each was

   *
   * <p>A non-empty {@link SetMultimap} cannot be equal to a non-empty {@link ListMultimap}, since
   * their {@link #asMap} views contain unequal collections as values. However, any two empty
   * multimaps are equal, because they both have empty {@link #asMap} views.
   */
  @Override
  boolean equals(@Nullable Object obj);

  /**
   * Returns the hash code for this multimap.
   *