|  -H 'Authorization: Bearer xyz789' \
        |  -H 'Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8' \
        |  --data '{
        |  "user": {
        |    "id": 123,
        |    "name": "Tim O'\''Reilly"
        |  },
        |  "roles": ["admin", "editor"],
        |  "active": true
        |}
        |'
        """.trimMargin(),
      )
  }

  @Test
  fun curlPostWithBinaryBody() {

          (int) Class.forName("android.os.Build$VERSION_CODES").getField("JELLY_BEAN").get(null);
      /*
       * I assume that this check can't fail because JELLY_BEAN will be present only if we're
       * running under Jelly Bean or higher. But it seems safest to check.
       */
      if (version < jellyBean) {
        return new ThrowingCreator();
      }
    } catch (ReflectiveOperationException e) {

      }

      /*
       * We use this only when getTypeName is available.
       *
       * Well, really, we use this when we think we're running under Java 8, as determined by some
       * logic in the static initializer, which does not check for getTypeName specifically. We
       * should really validate that it works as desired for all Android versions that we support.
       */
      @SuppressWarnings("NewApi")

     */
    if (throwable instanceof Error) {
      /*
       * TODO(cpovirk): Do we really want to log this if we called setException(throwable) and it
       * returned true? This was intentional (CL 46470009), but it seems odd compared to how we
       * normally handle Error.
       *
       * Similarly, do we really want to log the same Error more than once?
       */
      log(throwable);
    }
  }

    )
    assertThat(foxPart.body.readUtf8()).isEqualTo("Fox")

    assertThat(reader.nextPart()).isNull()
  }

  /**
   * Read 100 MiB of 'a' chars. This was really slow due to a performance bug in [MultipartReader],
   * and will be really slow if we regress the fix for that.
   */
  @Test
  fun `reading a large part with small byteCount`() {
    val multipartBody =
      MultipartBody
        .Builder("foo")

      }

      /*
       * We use this only when getTypeName is available.
       *
       * Well, really, we use this when we think we're running under Java 8, as determined by some
       * logic in the static initializer, which does not check for getTypeName specifically. We
       * should really validate that it works as desired for all Android versions that we support.
       */
      @IgnoreJRERequirement

    // Confirm that the connection pool was not corrupted by making another call.
    makeSimpleCall()
  }

  /**
   * If the server returns a full response, it doesn't really matter if the HTTP/2 stream is reset.
   * Attempts to write the request body fails fast.
   */
  @Test
  fun serverTruncatesRequestHttp2OnDuplexRequest() {
    enableProtocol(Protocol.HTTP_2)

      /*
       * Since reflection can't tell the difference between <T> and <T extends Object>, it doesn't
       * make a ton of sense to have a separate tests for each. But having tests for each doesn't
       * really hurt anything, and maybe it will serve a purpose in a future in which Java has a
       * built-in nullness feature?
       */
      "ExtendsObject",
    })
    <T extends Object> void withObjectBound(List<T> list) {}

 * test with reference to the same "lock-like object", and then their interactions with that object
 * are choreographed via the various methods on this class.
 *
 * <p>A "lock-like object" is really any object that may be used for concurrency control. If the
 * {@link #callAndAssertBlocks} method is ever called in a test, the lock-like object must have a

        return (GetCheckedTypeValidator) theClass.getEnumConstants()[0];
      } catch (ClassNotFoundException
          | RuntimeException
          | Error t) { // ensure we really catch *everything*
        return weakSetValidator();
      }
    }
  }

  // TODO(cpovirk): change parameter order to match other helper methods (Class, Throwable)?