private ReentrantReadWriteLock.WriteLock writeLockB;
  private ReentrantReadWriteLock.WriteLock writeLockC;
  private ReentrantLock lock1;
  private ReentrantLock lock2;
  private ReentrantLock lock3;
  private ReentrantLock lock01;
  private ReentrantLock lock02;
  private ReentrantLock lock03;

  @Override
  protected void setUp() throws Exception {
    super.setUp();

  private ReentrantReadWriteLock.WriteLock writeLockB;
  private ReentrantReadWriteLock.WriteLock writeLockC;
  private ReentrantLock lock1;
  private ReentrantLock lock2;
  private ReentrantLock lock3;
  private ReentrantLock lock01;
  private ReentrantLock lock02;
  private ReentrantLock lock03;

  @Override
  protected void setUp() throws Exception {
    super.setUp();

  public ReentrantLock newReentrantLock(String lockName) {
    return newReentrantLock(lockName, false);
  }

  /**
   * Creates a {@link ReentrantLock} with the given fairness policy. The {@code lockName} is used in
   * the warning or exception output to help identify the locks involved in the detected deadlock.
   */
  public ReentrantLock newReentrantLock(String lockName, boolean fair) {

 * method equivalent to {@link java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock#hasQueuedThread(Thread)}. If
 * the {@link #callAndAssertWaits} method is ever called in a test, the lock-like object must have a
 * method equivalent to {@link
 * java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock#hasWaiters(java.util.concurrent.locks.Condition)},

 * method equivalent to {@link java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock#hasQueuedThread(Thread)}. If
 * the {@link #callAndAssertWaits} method is ever called in a test, the lock-like object must have a
 * method equivalent to {@link
 * java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock#hasWaiters(java.util.concurrent.locks.Condition)},

    // shutDown or runOneIteration) run concurrently with one another.
    // TODO(lukes): why don't we use ListenableFuture to sequence things? Then we could drop the
    // lock.
    private final ReentrantLock lock = new ReentrantLock();

    @WeakOuter
    class Task implements Runnable {
      @Override
      public void run() {
        lock.lock();
        try {
          /*

  internal val connectionListener: ConnectionListener,
) : Http2Connection.Listener(), Connection, ExchangeCodec.Carrier {
  private var http2Connection: Http2Connection? = null

  internal val lock: ReentrantLock = ReentrantLock()

  // These properties are guarded by [lock].

  /**
   * If true, no new exchanges can be created on this connection. It is necessary to set this to

  /** The application's original request unadulterated by redirects or auth headers. */
  val originalRequest: Request,
  val forWebSocket: Boolean,
) : Call, Cloneable {
  internal val lock: ReentrantLock = ReentrantLock()

  private val connectionPool: RealConnectionPool = client.connectionPool.delegate

  internal val eventListener: EventListener = client.eventListenerFactory.create(this)

  private val timeout =

 * Most applications should share a process-wide [TaskRunner] and use queues for per-client work.
 */
class TaskRunner(
  val backend: Backend,
  internal val logger: Logger = TaskRunner.logger,
) {
  val lock: ReentrantLock = ReentrantLock()
  val condition: Condition = lock.newCondition()

  private var nextQueueName = 10000
  private var coordinatorWaiting = false
  private var coordinatorWakeUpAt = 0L

  /**

/** Writes HTTP/2 transport frames. */
@Suppress("NAME_SHADOWING")
class Http2Writer(
  private val sink: BufferedSink,
  private val client: Boolean,
) : Closeable {
  internal val lock: ReentrantLock = ReentrantLock()

  private val hpackBuffer: Buffer = Buffer()
  private var maxFrameSize: Int = INITIAL_MAX_FRAME_SIZE
  private var closed: Boolean = false
  val hpackWriter: Hpack.Writer = Hpack.Writer(out = hpackBuffer)