private ReentrantReadWriteLock.ReadLock readLockA;
  private ReentrantReadWriteLock.ReadLock readLockB;
  private ReentrantReadWriteLock.ReadLock readLockC;
  private ReentrantReadWriteLock.WriteLock writeLockA;
  private ReentrantReadWriteLock.WriteLock writeLockB;
  private ReentrantReadWriteLock.WriteLock writeLockC;
  private ReentrantLock lock1;
  private ReentrantLock lock2;
  private ReentrantLock lock3;

  private ReentrantReadWriteLock.ReadLock readLockA;
  private ReentrantReadWriteLock.ReadLock readLockB;
  private ReentrantReadWriteLock.ReadLock readLockC;
  private ReentrantReadWriteLock.WriteLock writeLockA;
  private ReentrantReadWriteLock.WriteLock writeLockB;
  private ReentrantReadWriteLock.WriteLock writeLockC;
  private ReentrantLock lock1;
  private ReentrantLock lock2;
  private ReentrantLock lock3;

import java.util.concurrent.locks.Condition;
import java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock;
import java.util.function.BooleanSupplier;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * A synchronization abstraction supporting waiting on arbitrary boolean conditions.
 *
 * <p>This class is intended as a replacement for {@link ReentrantLock}. Code using {@code Monitor}

 * method equivalent to {@link java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock#hasQueuedThread(Thread)}. If
 * the {@link #callAndAssertWaits} method is ever called in a test, the lock-like object must have a
 * method equivalent to {@link
 * java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock#hasWaiters(java.util.concurrent.locks.Condition)},

 * method equivalent to {@link java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock#hasQueuedThread(Thread)}. If
 * the {@link #callAndAssertWaits} method is ever called in a test, the lock-like object must have a
 * method equivalent to {@link
 * java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock#hasWaiters(java.util.concurrent.locks.Condition)},

    // shutDown or runOneIteration) run concurrently with one another.
    // TODO(lukes): why don't we use ListenableFuture to sequence things? Then we could drop the
    // lock.
    private final ReentrantLock lock = new ReentrantLock();

    @WeakOuter
    final class Task implements Runnable {
      @Override
      public void run() {
        lock.lock();
        try {
          /*

  public ReentrantLock newReentrantLock(String lockName) {
    return newReentrantLock(lockName, false);
  }

  /**
   * Creates a {@link ReentrantLock} with the given fairness policy. The {@code lockName} is used in
   * the warning or exception output to help identify the locks involved in the detected deadlock.
   */
  public ReentrantLock newReentrantLock(String lockName, boolean fair) {

    /**
     *
     */
    private static final int SIGNATURE_OFFSET = 48;
    private static final int SIGNATURE_LENGTH = 16;
    private final Mac digest;
    private final ReentrantLock signingLock = new ReentrantLock();
    private byte[] signingKey;
    private final String algorithmName;
    private final java.security.Provider provider;
    private volatile boolean closed = false;

    /**

    // shutDown or runOneIteration) run concurrently with one another.
    // TODO(lukes): why don't we use ListenableFuture to sequence things? Then we could drop the
    // lock.
    private final ReentrantLock lock = new ReentrantLock();

    @WeakOuter
    final class Task implements Runnable {
      @Override
      public void run() {
        lock.lock();
        try {
          /*

import java.util.concurrent.Semaphore;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
import java.util.concurrent.locks.Condition;
import java.util.concurrent.locks.Lock;
import java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Tests for {@link Uninterruptibles}.
 *
 * @author Anthony Zana
 */
@NullUnmarked