assertTrue(Smb2Constants.SMB2_DIALECT_0210 < Smb2Constants.SMB2_DIALECT_0300, "SMB 2.1 should be less than SMB 3.0");
            assertTrue(Smb2Constants.SMB2_DIALECT_0300 < Smb2Constants.SMB2_DIALECT_0302, "SMB 3.0 should be less than SMB 3.0.2");

import org.jspecify.annotations.NullMarked;

/**
 * Generators of different types of sets and derived collections from sets.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 * @author Jared Levy
 * @author Hayward Chan
 */
@GwtCompatible
@NullMarked
public class SetGenerators {

  public static class ImmutableSetCopyOfGenerator extends TestStringSetGenerator {
    @Override
    protected Set<String> create(String[] elements) {

    byte[] key = fillByteArray(80, 0xaa);
    String data = "Test Using Larger Than Block-Size Key - Hash Key First";

    checkSha1("aa4ae5e15272d00e95705637ce8a3b55ed402112", key, data);
  }

  public void testRfc2202_hmacSha1_case7() {
    byte[] key = fillByteArray(80, 0xaa);
    String data = "Test Using Larger Than Block-Size Key and Larger Than One Block-Size Data";

import java.util.TreeSet;
import java.util.stream.Collector;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * GWT emulation of {@link com.google.common.collect.ImmutableSortedSet}.
 *
 * @author Hayward Chan
 */
public abstract class ImmutableSortedSet<E> extends ForwardingImmutableSet<E>
    implements SortedSet<E>, SortedIterable<E> {
  // TODO(cpovirk): split into ImmutableSortedSet/ForwardingImmutableSortedSet?

     * In that explanation's notation, our `overlap` check would be `x1 < y2 && y1 < x2`. We've
     * flipped one part of the check so that we're using "less than" in both cases (rather than a
     * mix of "less than" and "greater than"). We've also switched to "strictly less than" rather
     * than "less than or equal to" because of *handwave* the difference between "endpoints of
     * inclusive ranges" and "Cuts."
     */

  }

  /**
   * Returns {@code true} if each element in {@code iterable} after the first is greater than or
   * equal to the element that preceded it, according to the specified comparator. Note that this is
   * always true when the iterable has fewer than two elements.
   */
  public static <T extends @Nullable Object> boolean isInOrder(
      Iterable<? extends T> iterable, Comparator<T> comparator) {

      if (collection.size() <= 2L * k) {
        // In this case, just dumping the collection to an array and sorting is
        // faster than using the implementation for Iterator, which is
        // specialized for k much smaller than n.

        @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // c only contains E's and doesn't escape
        E[] array = (E[]) collection.toArray();
        sort(array, this);

 * passing in unsanitized user data then a malicious user could force it. A light shuffle of the
 * data using an unpredictable seed should normally be enough to thwart this attack.
 *
 * <p>The time taken to compute multiple quantiles on the same dataset using {@link Scale#indexes

   * perform better than its longhand equivalent, but should not perform worse.
   *
   * @since 12.0
   */
  HashCode hashInt(int input);

  /**
   * Shortcut for {@code newHasher().putLong(input).hash()}; returns the hash code for the given
   * {@code long} value, interpreted in little-endian byte order. The implementation <i>might</i>

   * perform better than its longhand equivalent, but should not perform worse.
   *
   * @since 12.0
   */
  HashCode hashInt(int input);

  /**
   * Shortcut for {@code newHasher().putLong(input).hash()}; returns the hash code for the given
   * {@code long} value, interpreted in little-endian byte order. The implementation <i>might</i>