Name:     "istio-sidecar-injector",
					Revision: "default",
					Reason:   "Namespace has istio-injection=disabled label, preventing injection",
				},
				{
					Name:     "istio-sidecar-injector-1-16",
					Revision: "1-16",
					Injected: false,
					Reason:   "Namespace has istio-injection=disabled label, preventing injection",
				},
				{
					Name:     "istio-sidecar-injector-deactivated",
					Revision: "default",

Она проектировалась таким образом, чтобы быть простой в использовании и облегчить любому разработчику интеграцию других компонентов с **FastAPI**.

## Что такое "Dependency Injection" (инъекция зависимости)

	} else {
		injector, err = setUpExternalInjector(cliContext, revision, injectorAddress)
		if err != nil || injector.clientConfig == nil {
			log.Warnf("failed to get injection config from mutatingWebhookConfigurations %q, will fall back to "+
				"get injection from the injection configmap %q : %v", whcName, defaultInjectWebhookConfigName, err)
			if *sidecarTemplate, err = getInjectConfigFromConfigMap(cliContext, revision); err != nil {

Es ist so konzipiert, sehr einfach zu verwenden zu sein und es jedem Entwickler sehr leicht zu machen, andere Komponenten mit **FastAPI** zu integrieren.

## Was ist „Dependency Injection“

	"istio.io/istio/pkg/config/analysis/analyzers/injection"
	analyzer_util "istio.io/istio/pkg/config/analysis/analyzers/util"
	"istio.io/istio/pkg/config/resource"
	"istio.io/istio/pkg/kube"
	"istio.io/istio/pkg/kube/inject"
	"istio.io/istio/pkg/slices"
	"istio.io/istio/pkg/util/sets"
)

type revisionCount struct {
	// pods in a revision
	pods int
	// pods that are disabled from injection
	disabled int

referring to control plane revisions for sidecar injection.

With revision tags, rather than relabeling a namespace from "istio.io/rev=revision-a" to "istio.io/rev=revision-b" to
change which control plane revision handles injection, it's possible to create a revision tag "prod" and label our

				if injectionWhConf.Service == nil {
					t.Fatalf("expected injection service %s, got nil", tc.whSVC)
				}
				if injectionWhConf.Service.Name != tc.whSVC {
					t.Fatalf("expected injection service %s, got %s", tc.whSVC, injectionWhConf.Service.Name)
				}
			}
			if tc.whURL != "" {
				if injectionWhConf.URL == nil {
					t.Fatalf("expected injection URL %s, got nil", tc.whURL)
				}

- and the other end is in ztunnel's pod

and setting up iptables rules to funnel traffic thru that socket "tube" to ztunnel and back.

This effectively behaves like ztunnel is an in-pod sidecar, without actually requiring the injection of ztunnel as a sidecar into the pod manifest, or mutatating the application pod in any way.

   ** plugin management injection: <<<PluginManagementInjector>>> ({{{./apidocs/org/apache/maven/model/management/PluginManagementInjector.html}javadoc}}),
   with its <<<DefaultPluginManagementInjector>>> implementation
   ({{{./xref/org/apache/maven/model/management/DefaultPluginManagementInjector.html}source}})

It achieves something somewhat similar to what can be done with Flask-apispec.

It has an integrated dependency injection system, inspired by Angular 2. It requires pre-registering the "injectables" (like all the other dependency injection systems I know), so, it adds to the verbosity and code repetition.