PAST(Timeout.MIN, Timeout.MINUS_SMALL, Timeout.ZERO),
    FUTURE(Timeout.SMALL, Timeout.MAX),
    SMALL(Timeout.SMALL),
    FINITE(Timeout.MIN, Timeout.MINUS_SMALL, Timeout.ZERO, Timeout.SMALL),
    INFINITE(Timeout.LARGE, Timeout.MAX);

    final ImmutableList<Timeout> timeouts;

    TimeoutsToUse(Timeout... timeouts) {
      this.timeouts = ImmutableList.copyOf(timeouts);
    }
  }

    PAST(Timeout.MIN, Timeout.MINUS_SMALL, Timeout.ZERO),
    FUTURE(Timeout.SMALL, Timeout.MAX),
    SMALL(Timeout.SMALL),
    FINITE(Timeout.MIN, Timeout.MINUS_SMALL, Timeout.ZERO, Timeout.SMALL),
    INFINITE(Timeout.LARGE, Timeout.MAX);

    final ImmutableList<Timeout> timeouts;

    TimeoutsToUse(Timeout... timeouts) {
      this.timeouts = ImmutableList.copyOf(timeouts);
    }
  }

    }

    @Override
    public Optional<Long> sizeIfKnown() {
      if (!(sources instanceof Collection)) {
        // Infinite Iterables can cause problems here. Of course, it's true that most of the other
        // methods on this class also have potential problems with infinite  Iterables. But unlike
        // those, this method can cause issues even if the user is dealing with a (finite) slice()

 * that provide readers that are:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li><b>Finite:</b> Many operations, such as {@link #length()} and {@link #read()}, will either
 *       block indefinitely or fail if the source creates an infinite reader.
 *   <li><b>Non-destructive:</b> A <i>destructive</i> reader will consume or otherwise alter the
 *       source as they are read from it. A source that provides such readers will not be reusable,

	// so that no file modifications are missed while and after checking
	// note: we create a file watcher for each invocation, otherwise when we write to the directories
	// we would get infinite looping of events
	//
	// Additionally, fsnotify will lose existing watches on atomic copies (due to overwrite/rename),
	// so we have to re-watch after re-copy to make sure we always have fresh watches.

   * #remove} to forward to this implementation.
   *
   * <p>Alternately, you may wish to override {@link #remove} with {@code keySet().remove}, assuming
   * that approach would not lead to an infinite loop.
   *
   * @since 7.0
   */
  @CheckForNull
  protected V standardRemove(@CheckForNull Object key) {
    Iterator<Entry<K, V>> entryIterator = entrySet().iterator();
    while (entryIterator.hasNext()) {

        .withFeatures(computeElementSetFeatures(parentBuilder.getFeatures()))
        .suppressing(parentBuilder.getSuppressedTests())
        .createTestSuite();
  }

  /**
   * To avoid infinite recursion, test suites with these marker features won't have derived suites
   * created for them.
   */
  enum NoRecurse implements Feature<Void> {
    SUBMULTISET,
    DESCENDING;

    @Override

   * space in the buffer completely. In general this is a performance problem since the buffer size
   * is permanently reduced, but with certain Reader implementations it could also cause the buffer
   * size to reach 0, causing an infinite loop.
   */
  public void testCopyWithReaderThatDoesNotFillBuffer() throws IOException {
    // need a long enough string for the buffer to hit 0 remaining before the copy completes

   * space in the buffer completely. In general this is a performance problem since the buffer size
   * is permanently reduced, but with certain Reader implementations it could also cause the buffer
   * size to reach 0, causing an infinite loop.
   */
  public void testCopyWithReaderThatDoesNotFillBuffer() throws IOException {
    // need a long enough string for the buffer to hit 0 remaining before the copy completes

   * iterable}. The iterator's {@code hasNext()} method returns {@code true} until {@code iterable}
   * is empty.
   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> Typical uses of the resulting iterator may produce an infinite loop. You
   * should use an explicit {@code break} or be certain that you will eventually remove all the
   * elements.
   *
   * <p>To cycle over the iterable {@code n} times, use the following: {@code