@J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // suite
  @AndroidIncompatible // test-suite builders
  public static Test suite() {
    TestSuite suite = new TestSuite();

    suite.addTest(
        SetTestSuiteBuilder.using(
                new TestStringSetGenerator() {
                  @Override
                  protected Set<String> create(String[] elements) {
                    return union(emptySet(), emptySet());
                  }

    return emptySet();
  }

  protected Collection<Method> suppressForConcurrentSkipListSetWithComparator() {
    return emptySet();
  }

  public Test testsForEmptySet() {
    return SetTestSuiteBuilder.using(
            new TestStringSetGenerator() {
              @Override
              public Set<String> create(String[] elements) {
                return emptySet();
              }
            })

   * separator between each, to {@code appendable}.
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public <A extends Appendable> A appendTo(A appendable, Iterable<?> parts) throws IOException {
    return appendTo(appendable, parts.iterator());
  }

  /**
   * Appends the string representation of each of {@code parts}, using the previously configured

  public static Test suite() {
    TestSuite suite = new TestSuite();

    suite.addTest(transformSuite());
    suite.addTest(filterSuite());

    suite.addTest(
        ListMultimapTestSuiteBuilder.using(
                new TestStringListMultimapGenerator() {
                  @Override
                  protected ListMultimap<String, String> create(Entry<String, String>[] entries) {

   *       using this method. For example, {@code not(in(target))} is generally more readable than
   *       {@code not(target::contains)}.
   *   <li>This method's name conflicts with Kotlin's {@code in} operator.
   * </ul>
   *
   * <p><b>Discouraged:</b> Prefer using either {@code target::contains} or {@code x ->

        MapEntrySetTester.getSetValueWithNullValuesPresentMethod(),
        MapEntrySetTester.getIteratorSetValueAndRemove());
  }

  public Test testsForCheckedMap() {
    return MapTestSuiteBuilder.using(
            new TestStringMapGenerator() {
              @Override
              protected Map<String, String> create(Entry<String, String>[] entries) {

  }

  protected Collection<Method> suppressForConcurrentSkipListSetWithComparator() {
    return emptySet();
  }

  public Test testsForCheckedNavigableSet() {
    return SortedSetTestSuiteBuilder.using(
            new TestStringSortedSetGenerator() {
              @Override
              public NavigableSet<String> create(String[] elements) {
                NavigableSet<String> innerSet = new TreeSet<>();

When deploying FastAPI applications a common approach is to build a **Linux container image**. It's normally done using <a href="https://www.docker.com/" class="external-link" target="_blank">**Docker**</a>. You can then deploy that container image in one of a few possible ways.

Using Linux containers has several advantages including **security**, **replicability**, **simplicity**, and others.

/// tip

### `ORJSONResponse` { #orjsonresponse }

A fast alternative JSON response using <a href="https://github.com/ijl/orjson" class="external-link" target="_blank">`orjson`</a>, as you read above.

/// info

This requires installing `orjson` for example with `pip install orjson`.

///

### `UJSONResponse` { #ujsonresponse }

    // Not testing rowKeySet() or columnKeySet() of Table.transformValues()
    // since the transformation doesn't affect the row and column key sets.

    suite.addTest(
        SetTestSuiteBuilder.using(
                new TestStringSetGenerator() {
                  @Override
                  protected Set<String> create(String[] elements) {
                    Table<String, Integer, Character> table =