type InotifyEvent struct {
	Wd     int32
	Mask   uint32
	Cookie uint32
	Len    uint32
}

const SizeofInotifyEvent = 0x10

type PtraceRegs struct {
	Psw                      PtracePsw
	Gprs                     [16]uint64
	Acrs                     [16]uint32
	Orig_gpr2                uint64
	Fp_regs                  PtraceFpregs
	Per_info                 PtracePer
	Ieee_instruction_pointer uint64
}

	Psw                      PtracePsw
	Gprs                     [16]uint64
	Acrs                     [16]uint32
	Orig_gpr2                uint64
	Fp_regs                  PtraceFpregs
	Per_info                 PtracePer
	Ieee_instruction_pointer uint64
}

type PtracePsw struct {
	Mask uint64
	Addr uint64
}

type PtraceFpregs struct {
	Fpc  uint32
	Fprs [16]float64
}

type PtracePer struct {

	NFREG  = 16 // number of floating point registers
)

const (
	// General purpose registers (GPRs).
	REG_R0 = obj.RBaseS390X + iota
	REG_R1
	REG_R2
	REG_R3
	REG_R4
	REG_R5
	REG_R6
	REG_R7
	REG_R8
	REG_R9
	REG_R10
	REG_R11
	REG_R12
	REG_R13
	REG_R14
	REG_R15

	// Floating point registers (FPRs).
	REG_F0
	REG_F1
	REG_F2
	REG_F3
	REG_F4
	REG_F5
	REG_F6
	REG_F7
	REG_F8

	PT_REGHSET              = 22 // Read all GPRHs
	PT_ATTACH               = 30 // Attach to a process
	PT_DETACH               = 31 // Detach from a process
	PT_REGSET               = 32 // Read all GPRs
	PT_REATTACH             = 33 // Reattach to a process
	PT_LDINFO               = 34 // Read loader info
	PT_MULTI                = 35 // Multi process mode
	PT_LD64INFO             = 36 // RMODE64 Info Area

!!! info
    Leider kann ich PRs, nur weil sie von Mehreren gutgeheißen wurden, nicht einfach vertrauen.

!!! info
    Unfortunately, I can't simply trust PRs that just have several approvals.

    Several times it has happened that there are PRs with 3, 5 or more approvals, probably because the description is appealing, but when I check the PRs, they are actually broken, have a bug, or don't solve the problem they claim to solve. 😅

    discussions: Discussions


class DiscussionsResponseData(BaseModel):
    repository: DiscussionsRepository


class DiscussionsResponse(BaseModel):
    data: DiscussionsResponseData


# PRs


class LabelNode(BaseModel):
    name: str


class Labels(BaseModel):
    nodes: List[LabelNode]


class ReviewNode(BaseModel):
    author: Union[Author, None] = None
    state: str

* [Sign off your commits](https://git-scm.com/docs/git-commit#Documentation/git-commit.txt---signoff) to indicate that you agree to the terms of [Developer Certificate of Origin](https://developercertificate.org/). We can only accept PRs that have all commits signed off.
* Keep commits discrete. Avoid including multiple unrelated changes in a single commit.

aliases:
  # Note: sig-architecture-approvers has approval on root files (including go.mod/go.sum) until https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/pull/21398 is resolved.
  # People with approve rights via this alias should defer dependency update PRs to dep-approvers.
  sig-architecture-approvers:
    - dims
    - derekwaynecarr
    - johnbelamaric
  # sig-auth subproject aliases
  sig-auth-audit-approvers:
    - sttts
    - tallclair
  sig-auth-audit-reviewers:

	LFSUX: "FMOVSU", STFSUX: "FMOVSU",
	CMPD: "CMP", CMPDI: "CMP",
	CMPW: "CMPW", CMPWI: "CMPW",
	CMPLD: "CMPU", CMPLDI: "CMPU",
	CMPLW: "CMPWU", CMPLWI: "CMPWU",
	MTSPR: "MOVD", MFSPR: "MOVD", // the width is ambiguous for SPRs
	B:  "BR",
	BL: "CALL",