*/
@NullMarked
@GwtCompatible
public class SuppliersTest extends TestCase {

  static class CountingSupplier implements Supplier<Integer> {
    int calls = 0;

    @Override
    public Integer get() {
      calls++;
      return calls * 10;
    }

    @Override
    public String toString() {
      return "CountingSupplier";
    }
  }

 */
@NullMarked
@GwtCompatible
public class SuppliersTest extends TestCase {

  static class CountingSupplier implements Supplier<Integer> {
    int calls = 0;

    @Override
    public Integer get() {
      calls++;
      return calls * 10;
    }

    @Override
    public String toString() {
      return "CountingSupplier";
    }
  }

        // Verify getRequest returns the exact same instance
        SmbNegotiationRequest request = negotiation.getRequest();
        assertSame(mockRequest, request);

        // Verify multiple calls return the same instance
        assertSame(request, negotiation.getRequest());
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("getResponse should return the same response instance")
    void testGetResponse() {

      return executorServiceOrNull!!
    }

  /** Ready async calls in the order they'll be run. */
  private val readyAsyncCalls = ArrayDeque<AsyncCall>()

  /** Running asynchronous calls. Includes canceled calls that haven't finished yet. */
  private val runningAsyncCalls = ArrayDeque<AsyncCall>()

  /** Running synchronous calls. Includes canceled calls that haven't finished yet. */

      }

      else -> {
        // No connections, idle or in use.
        return -1
      }
    }
  }

  /**
   * Prunes any leaked calls and then returns the number of remaining live calls on [connection].
   * Calls are leaked if the connection is tracking them but the application code has abandoned
   * them. Leak detection is imprecise and relies on garbage collection.
   */

 * Tasks execute with the same happens-before order that the function calls to {@link #submit} and
 * {@link #submitAsync} that submitted those tasks had.
 *
 * <p>This class has limited support for cancellation and other "early completions":
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>While calls to {@code submit} and {@code submitAsync} return a {@code Future} that can be

   * as {@code execute} and {@code invokeAny}, are implemented in terms of calls to {@code
   * delegate.execute}. All other methods are forwarded unchanged to the delegate. This implies that
   * the returned {@code ListeningExecutorService} never calls the delegate's {@code submit}, {@code
   * invokeAll}, and {@code invokeAny} methods, so any special handling of tasks must be implemented

    // Cancel some calls. That doesn't impact running or queued.
    a2.cancel()
    a3.cancel()
    assertThat(dispatcher.runningCalls())
      .containsExactlyInAnyOrder(a1, a2)
    assertThat(dispatcher.queuedCalls()).isEmpty()

    // Let the calls finish.
    waiting.countDown()
    t1.join()
    t2.join()

    // Now we should have 0 running calls and 0 queued calls.

        // Then
        assertNotNull(transportPool, "Transport pool should not be null");
        assertSame(transportPool, context.getTransportPool(), "Should return same instance on multiple calls");
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("getConfig should return the provided configuration")
    void testGetConfig() {
        // When
        Configuration config = context.getConfig();

 *        * body ([responseBodyStart], [responseBodyEnd])
 *
 * This nesting is typical but not strict. For example, when calls use "Expect: continue" the
 * request body start and end events occur within the response header events. Similarly,
 * [duplex calls][RequestBody.isDuplex] interleave the request and response bodies.
 *