00000030  73 db fc 90 18 3f ac e5  1f 5d 86 24 80 75 ec a3  |s....?...].$.u..|
00000040  c6 aa e9 05 c1 47 21 bd  30 f6 41 43 c0 2f 00 00  |.....G!.0.AC./..|
00000050  11 ff 01 00 01 00 00 0b  00 04 03 00 01 02 00 17  |................|
00000060  00 00 16 03 03 02 66 0b  00 02 62 00 02 5f 00 02  |......f...b.._..|
00000070  5c 30 82 02 58 30 82 01  8d a0 03 02 01 02 02 11  |\0..X0..........|

		{s: time.Unix(1, 2).UTC(), d: &scanstr, wantstr: "1970-01-01T00:00:01.000000002Z"},
		{s: time.Time{}, d: &scanstr, wantstr: "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z"},
		{s: time.Unix(1, 2).UTC(), d: &scanbytes, wantbytes: []byte("1970-01-01T00:00:01.000000002Z")},
		{s: time.Unix(1, 2).UTC(), d: &scaniface, wantiface: time.Unix(1, 2).UTC()},

		// To []byte

// The error from the true ticks-per-second in a linux/amd64 VM seems to be:
// -   1 ms -> ~0.02% error
// -   5 ms -> ~0.004% error
// -  10 ms -> ~0.002% error
// -  50 ms -> ~0.0003% error
// - 100 ms -> ~0.0001% error
//
// We're willing to take 0.004% error here, because ticksPerSecond is intended to be used for

00000360  01 02 01 03 02 02 02 04  02 05 02 06 02 00 00 16  |................|
00000370  03 03 00 04 0e 00 00 00                           |........|
>>> Flow 3 (client to server)
00000000  16 03 03 01 fd 0b 00 01  f9 00 01 f6 00 01 f3 30  |...............0|
00000010  82 01 ef 30 82 01 58 a0  03 02 01 02 02 10 5c 19  |...0..X.......\.|
00000020  c1 89 65 83 55 6f dc 0b  c9 b9 93 9f e9 bc 30 0d  |..e.Uo........0.|

// CHECK-DAG:           %[[VAL_2:.*]] = "tfl.pseudo_const"{{.*}}dense<[0, 0, 0, 2]> : tensor<4xi32>
// CHECK-DAG:           %[[VAL_3:.*]] = "tfl.pseudo_const"{{.*}}dense<[-1, -1, -1, 2]> : tensor<4xi32>
// CHECK-DAG:           %[[VAL_4:.*]] = "tfl.pseudo_const"{{.*}}dense<[0, 0, 0, 4]> : tensor<4xi32>
// CHECK-DAG:           %[[VAL_5:.*]] = "tfl.pseudo_const"{{.*}}dense<[-1, -1, -1, 81]> : tensor<4xi32>

00000330  00 0a 0d 00 00 06 03 01  02 40 00 00 16 03 01 00  |.........@......|
00000340  04 0e 00 00 00                                    |.....|
>>> Flow 3 (client to server)
00000000  16 03 01 01 fd 0b 00 01  f9 00 01 f6 00 01 f3 30  |...............0|
00000010  82 01 ef 30 82 01 58 a0  03 02 01 02 02 10 5c 19  |...0..X.......\.|
00000020  c1 89 65 83 55 6f dc 0b  c9 b9 93 9f e9 bc 30 0d  |..e.Uo........0.|

^V=== RUN   chatty with recursion and json/#00/#00
^V--- PASS: chatty with recursion and json/#00/#00 (N.NNs)
^V=== NAME  chatty with recursion and json/#00
^V=== RUN   chatty with recursion and json/#00/#01
    sub_test.go:NNN: skip
^V--- SKIP: chatty with recursion and json/#00/#01 (N.NNs)
^V=== NAME  chatty with recursion and json/#00
^V=== RUN   chatty with recursion and json/#00/#02
    sub_test.go:NNN: fail

000000b0  00 1a 00 18 08 04 04 03  08 07 08 05 08 06 04 01  |................|
000000c0  05 01 06 01 05 03 06 03  02 01 02 03 00 2b 00 09  |.............+..|
000000d0  08 03 04 03 03 03 02 03  01 00 33 00 26 00 24 00  |..........3.&.$.|
000000e0  1d 00 20 2f e5 7d a3 47  cd 62 43 15 28 da ac 5f  |.. /.}.G.bC.(.._|
000000f0  bb 29 07 30 ff f6 84 af  c4 cf c2 ed 90 99 5f 58  |.).0.........._X|

000000b0  00 1a 00 18 08 04 04 03  08 07 08 05 08 06 04 01  |................|
000000c0  05 01 06 01 05 03 06 03  02 01 02 03 00 2b 00 09  |.............+..|
000000d0  08 03 04 03 03 03 02 03  01 00 33 00 26 00 24 00  |..........3.&.$.|
000000e0  1d 00 20 2f e5 7d a3 47  cd 62 43 15 28 da ac 5f  |.. /.}.G.bC.(.._|
000000f0  bb 29 07 30 ff f6 84 af  c4 cf c2 ed 90 99 5f 58  |.).0.........._X|

000003a0  03 01 02 01 03 02 02 02  04 02 05 02 06 02 00 00  |................|
000003b0  16 03 03 00 04 0e 00 00  00                       |.........|
>>> Flow 3 (client to server)
00000000  16 03 03 01 fd 0b 00 01  f9 00 01 f6 00 01 f3 30  |...............0|
00000010  82 01 ef 30 82 01 58 a0  03 02 01 02 02 10 5c 19  |...0..X.......\.|
00000020  c1 89 65 83 55 6f dc 0b  c9 b9 93 9f e9 bc 30 0d  |..e.Uo........0.|