* Why is this change done? What's the use case?
* For user facing features, what will the API look like?
* What test cases should it have? What could go wrong?
* How will it roughly be implemented? We'll happily provide code pointers to save you time.

We may ask you to answer these questions directly in the GitHub issue or (for large changes) in a shared Google Doc.

        final Iterator<? extends Entry<? extends E>> iterator1 = multiset1.entrySet().iterator();
        final Iterator<? extends Entry<? extends E>> iterator2 = multiset2.entrySet().iterator();
        // TODO(lowasser): consider making the entries live views
        return new AbstractIterator<Entry<E>>() {
          @Override
          @CheckForNull
          protected Entry<E> computeNext() {
            if (iterator1.hasNext()) {

systems is data "<abbr title="also called marshalling, conversion">serialization</abbr>" which is taking data from the code (Python) and converting it into something that can be sent through the network. For example, converting an object containing data from a database into a JSON object. Converting `datetime` objects into strings, etc.

Another big feature needed by APIs is data validation, making sure that the data is valid, given certain parameters. For example, that some field is an `int`,...

   * use {@code new }{@link ArrayList#ArrayList(int) ArrayList}{@code <>(int)} directly, taking
   * advantage of <a href="http://goo.gl/iz2Wi">"diamond" syntax</a>. (Unlike here, there is no risk
   * of overload ambiguity, since the {@code ArrayList} constructors very wisely did not accept
   * varargs.)
   *
   * @param initialArraySize the exact size of the initial backing array for the returned array list

   * is unnecessary; for example, {@code copyOf(copyOf(anArrayList))} will copy the data only once.
   * This reduces the expense of habitually making defensive copies at API boundaries. However, the
   * precise conditions for skipping the copy operation are undefined.
   *
   * @throws NullPointerException if any of {@code elements} is null

OkHttp 4.x Change Log
=====================

## Version 4.12.0

_2023-10-16_

 *  Fix: Don't hang taking headers for HTTP 103 responses.

 *  Fix: Recover gracefully when a cache entry's certificate is corrupted.

 *  Fix: Fail permanently when there's a failure loading the bundled public suffix database.
    This is the dataset that powers `HttpUrl.topPrivateDomain()`.

    defaultSupportedCipherSuites =
      handshakeCertificates.sslSocketFactory().supportedCipherSuites.toList()
  }

  @Test
  fun testDefaultHandshakeCipherSuiteOrderingTls12Restricted() {
    // We are avoiding making guarantees on ordering of secondary Platforms.
    platform.assumeNotConscrypt()
    platform.assumeNotBouncyCastle()

    val client = makeClient(ConnectionSpec.RESTRICTED_TLS, TlsVersion.TLS_1_2)

   * - median with compute taking a double-collection and with computeInPlace;
   * - quartiles with index and with indexes taking int-varargs, and with compute taking a
   *   double-collection and with computeInPlace;
   * - scale with index and with indexes taking int-varargs, and with all overloads of compute
   *   taking a double-collection and with computeInPlace;

   * - median with compute taking a double-collection and with computeInPlace;
   * - quartiles with index and with indexes taking int-varargs, and with compute taking a
   *   double-collection and with computeInPlace;
   * - scale with index and with indexes taking int-varargs, and with all overloads of compute
   *   taking a double-collection and with computeInPlace;

Having another process manager inside the container (as would be with Gunicorn or Uvicorn managing Uvicorn workers) would only add **unnecessary complexity** that you are most probably already taking care of with your cluster system.

### Containers with Multiple Processes and Special Cases