final byte[] bytes;
    final int asInt;
    final Long asLong; // null means that asLong should throw an exception
    final String toString;

    ExpectedHashCode(byte[] bytes, int asInt, @Nullable Long asLong, String toString) {
      this.bytes = bytes;
      this.asInt = asInt;
      this.asLong = asLong;
      this.toString = toString;
    }
  }

    final byte[] bytes;
    final int asInt;
    final Long asLong; // null means that asLong should throw an exception
    final String toString;

    ExpectedHashCode(byte[] bytes, int asInt, @Nullable Long asLong, String toString) {
      this.bytes = bytes;
      this.asInt = asInt;
      this.asLong = asLong;
      this.toString = toString;
    }
  }

        Funnel<? super T> funnel,
        int numHashFunctions,
        LockFreeBitArray bits) {
      long bitSize = bits.bitSize();
      long hash64 = Hashing.murmur3_128().hashObject(object, funnel).asLong();
      int hash1 = (int) hash64;
      int hash2 = (int) (hash64 >>> 32);

      boolean bitsChanged = false;
      for (int i = 1; i <= numHashFunctions; i++) {
        int combinedHash = hash1 + (i * hash2);

   *     and {@link Character#MAX_RADIX}.
   */
  public static String toString(int x, int radix) {
    long asLong = x & INT_MASK;
    return Long.toString(asLong, radix);
  }

   * following conditions:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>You want to assign the same fraction of inputs to each bucket.
   *   <li>When you reduce the number of buckets, you can accept that the most recently added
   *       buckets will be removed first. More concretely, if you are dividing traffic among tasks,

- we need to deal with a shared context for plugins, like the guarded mojos
- we need to deal with plugins as core application logic which can also interact with plugins

* Along with this comes the testing strategies that make this work
* The repository model where plugins can be stored and cataloged
* Bridging this into an OSGi system: if this could be done then we can basically take over p2

TODO

		}
		return r, err
	}
	return config.ToRetention(), nil
}

// enforceRetentionForDeletion checks if it is appropriate to remove an
// object according to locking configuration when this is lifecycle/ bucket quota asking.
func enforceRetentionForDeletion(ctx context.Context, objInfo ObjectInfo) (locked bool) {
	if objInfo.DeleteMarker {
		return false
	}

	lhold := objectlock.GetObjectLegalHoldMeta(objInfo.UserDefined)

We will have two triggers for sending config - requests and pushes.

#### Requests

	// Header indicating target cluster can receive delete marker replication requests because object has been replicated
	MinIOTargetReplicationReady = "X-Minio-Replication-Ready"
	// Header asking if cluster can receive delete marker replication request now.
	MinIOCheckDMReplicationReady = "X-Minio-Check-Replication-Ready"
	// Header indiicates last tag update time on source

It was found that the directory staging committer was the fastest among the three, S3A connector should be configured with the following parameters for optimal results:

```