*
   * <p>The recommended solution for finding the {@code minimum} of some values depends on the type
   * of your data and the number of elements you have. Read more in the Guava User Guide article on
   * <a href="https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/CollectionUtilitiesExplained#comparators">{@code
   * Comparators}</a>.
   *
   * @param a first value to compare, returned if less than or equal to b.

   * {@code ClassCastException} for any elements {@code e1} and {@code e2} in the multiset. If the
   * user attempts to add an element to the multiset that violates this constraint (for example, the
   * user attempts to add a string element to a set whose elements are integers), the {@code
   * add(Object)} call will throw a {@code ClassCastException}.
   *

  @Beta // only until we're confident that Java 8+ APIs are safe for our Android users
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // java.time.Duration
  @SuppressWarnings("Java7ApiChecker") // no more dangerous that wherever the user got the Duration
  @IgnoreJRERequirement
  public static <T extends @Nullable Object> Supplier<T> memoizeWithExpiration(
      Supplier<T> delegate, Duration duration) {
    checkNotNull(delegate);

@SuppressWarnings("GuardedBy") // TODO(b/35466881): Fix or suppress.
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
public final class Monitor {
  // TODO(user): Use raw LockSupport or AbstractQueuedSynchronizer instead of ReentrantLock.
  // TODO(user): "Port" jsr166 tests for ReentrantLock.
  //
  // TODO(user): Change API to make it impossible to use a Guard with the "wrong" monitor,
  //    by making the monitor implicit, and to eliminate other sources of IMSE.

 * granted immediately, but it is the <i>next</i> request that will experience extra throttling,
 * thus paying for the cost of the expensive task.
 *
 * @author Dimitris Andreou
 * @since 13.0
 */
// TODO(user): switch to nano precision. A natural unit of cost is "bytes", and a micro precision
// would mean a maximum rate of "1MB/s", which might be small in some cases.
@Beta
@J2ktIncompatible
@GwtIncompatible

 *
 * <p>A discrete domain always represents the <i>entire</i> set of values of its type; it cannot
 * represent partial domains such as "prime integers" or "strings of length 5."
 *
 * <p>See the Guava User Guide section on <a href=
 * "https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/RangesExplained#discrete-domains">{@code
 * DiscreteDomain}</a>.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 * @since 10.0
 */

      return;
    }
    fail("Should get equal to incompatible class error");
  }

  /** Test proper handling where an object is not equal to one the user has said should be equal */
  public void testInvalidNotEqualsEqualObject() {
    equalsTester.addEqualityGroup(reference, notEqualObject1);
    try {
      equalsTester.testEquals();

 * soon as one of them returns a nonzero result. This optimization is typically important only in
 * the presence of expensive {@code compareTo} and {@code compare} implementations.
 *
 * <p>See the Guava User Guide article on <a href=
 * "https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/CommonObjectUtilitiesExplained#comparecompareto">{@code
 * ComparisonChain}</a>.
 *
 * <h4 id="java8">Java 8+ equivalents</h4>
 *

 * worst case time complexity of O(N^2). You are extremely unlikely to hit this quadratic case on
 * randomly ordered data (the probability decreases faster than exponentially in N), but if you are
 * passing in unsanitized user data then a malicious user could force it. A light shuffle of the
 * data using an unpredictable seed should normally be enough to thwart this attack.
 *

import org.junit.After;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.junit.runners.JUnit4;

/** Tests for {@link StandardMutableValueGraph} and related functionality. */
// TODO(user): Expand coverage and move to proper test suite.
@RunWith(JUnit4.class)
public final class ValueGraphTest {
  private static final String DEFAULT = "default";

  MutableValueGraph<Integer, String> graph;

  @After