*       {@code consistentHash} will handle it. If, however, you are dividing traffic among
   *       servers {@code alpha}, {@code bravo}, and {@code charlie} and you occasionally need to
   *       take each of the servers offline, {@code consistentHash} will be a poor fit: It provides
   *       no way for you to specify which of the three buckets is disappearing. Thus, if your

   *
   * <p><b>Comparison to {@code java.util.Optional}:</b> this class leaves the specific choice of
   * hash code unspecified, unlike the Java 8+ equivalent.
   */
  @Override
  public abstract int hashCode();

  /**
   * Returns a string representation for this instance.
   *
   * <p><b>Comparison to {@code java.util.Optional}:</b> this class leaves the specific string

   *
   * <p><b>Comparison to {@code java.util.Optional}:</b> this class leaves the specific choice of
   * hash code unspecified, unlike the Java 8+ equivalent.
   */
  @Override
  public abstract int hashCode();

  /**
   * Returns a string representation for this instance.
   *
   * <p><b>Comparison to {@code java.util.Optional}:</b> this class leaves the specific string

  /** The HTTP {@code Accept-Language} header field name. */
  public static final String ACCEPT_LANGUAGE = "Accept-Language";
  /** The HTTP {@code Access-Control-Request-Headers} header field name. */
  public static final String ACCESS_CONTROL_REQUEST_HEADERS = "Access-Control-Request-Headers";
  /** The HTTP {@code Access-Control-Request-Method} header field name. */
  public static final String ACCESS_CONTROL_REQUEST_METHOD = "Access-Control-Request-Method";