* AtomicInteger's atomic operations, with some help from ConcurrentMap's atomic operations on
   * creation and removal (including automatic removal of zeroes). If the modification of an
   * AtomicInteger results in zero, we compareAndSet the value to zero; if that succeeds, we remove
   * the entry from the Map. If another operation sees a zero in the map, it knows that the entry is

      /*
       * requireNonNull is safe as long as callers pass a nextSibling that (a) has the same key and
       * (b) is present in the multimap. (And they do, except maybe in case of concurrent
       * modification, in which case all bets are off.)
       */
      KeyList<K, V> keyList = requireNonNull(keyToKeyList.get(key));
      keyList.count++;
      node.previous = nextSibling.previous;

   * AtomicInteger's atomic operations, with some help from ConcurrentMap's atomic operations on
   * creation and removal (including automatic removal of zeroes). If the modification of an
   * AtomicInteger results in zero, we compareAndSet the value to zero; if that succeeds, we remove
   * the entry from the Map. If another operation sees a zero in the map, it knows that the entry is

   * #add(Range) add} any range not {@linkplain Range#encloses(Range) enclosed} by {@code view}.
   */
  RangeSet<C> subRangeSet(Range<C> view);

  // Modification

  /**
   * Adds the specified range to this {@code RangeSet} (optional operation). That is, for equal
   * range sets a and b, the result of {@code a.add(range)} is that {@code a} will be the minimal

       *   to iterate it to exhaustion. Then we can apply the logic above about an empty
       *   columnIterator. (This assumes no concurrent modification, but behavior under concurrent
       *   modification is undefined, anyway.)
       */
      requireNonNull(rowEntry);
      Entry<C, V> columnEntry = columnIterator.next();

       *   to iterate it to exhaustion. Then we can apply the logic above about an empty
       *   columnIterator. (This assumes no concurrent modification, but behavior under concurrent
       *   modification is undefined, anyway.)
       */
      requireNonNull(rowEntry);
      Entry<C, V> columnEntry = columnIterator.next();

    this.inverse = inverse;
  }

  // Query Operations (optimizations)

  @Override
  public boolean containsValue(@CheckForNull Object value) {
    return inverse.containsKey(value);
  }

  // Modification Operations

  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  @Override
  @CheckForNull
  public V put(@ParametricNullness K key, @ParametricNullness V value) {
    return putInBothMaps(key, value, false);
  }

   * concurrent modification, the iterator fails quickly and cleanly, rather than risking arbitrary,
   * non-deterministic behavior at an undetermined time in the future.
   *
   * <p>Note that the fail-fast behavior of an iterator cannot be guaranteed as it is, generally
   * speaking, impossible to make any hard guarantees in the presence of unsynchronized concurrent

      /*
       * requireNonNull is safe as long as callers pass a nextSibling that (a) has the same key and
       * (b) is present in the multimap. (And they do, except maybe in case of concurrent
       * modification, in which case all bets are off.)
       */
      KeyList<K, V> keyList = requireNonNull(keyToKeyList.get(key));
      keyList.count++;
      node.previous = nextSibling.previous;

   * lists are sublist views of the original list, produced on demand using {@link List#subList(int,
   * int)}, and are subject to all the usual caveats about modification as explained in that API.
   *
   * @param list the list to return consecutive sublists of
   * @param size the desired size of each sublist (the last may be smaller)
   * @return a list of consecutive sublists