}},
			},
		}

		// only label if the user has provided their own value, otherwise we let istiod choose a default at runtime (service)
		// this will allow for gateway class to provide a default for that class rather than always forcing service or requiring users to configure correctly
		if trafficType != "" {
			if !validTrafficTypes.Contains(trafficType) {

      # Controls whether or not the untaint controller is active
      enabled: false
      # What namespace the untaint controller should watch for istio-cni pods. This is only required when istio-cni is running in a different namespace than istiod
      namespace: ""

    affinity: {}

    tolerations: []

    cpu:
      targetAverageUtilization: 80
    memory: {}
      # targetAverageUtilization: 80

		Long: `Command group used to interact with revision tags. Revision tags allow for the creation of mutable aliases
referring to control plane revisions for sidecar injection.

With revision tags, rather than relabeling a namespace from "istio.io/rev=revision-a" to "istio.io/rev=revision-b" to
change which control plane revision handles injection, it's possible to create a revision tag "prod" and label our

Historically, Istio had to really be consumed all-or-nothing for things to work as expected.
In particular, an easy answer to "I just want to have mTLS everywhere, then I can think about adopting the rest of service mesh" was desired.

## Goals

Ztunnel should:
* **Not break users**. This means that deploying Ztunnel should retain all existing Kubernetes behavior.

				}

				if len(pl.Items) < 1 {
					return errors.New("no pods found")
				}

				if len(pl.Items) > 1 {
					log.Warnf("more than 1 pods fits selector: %s; will use pod: %s", istiodLabelSelector, pl.Items[0].Name)
				}

				// only use the first pod in the list
				podName = pl.Items[0].Name
				ns = pl.Items[0].Namespace

				}

				if len(pl.Items) < 1 {
					return errors.New("no pods found")
				}

				if len(pl.Items) > 1 {
					log.Warnf("more than 1 pods fits selector: %s; will use pod: %s", labelSelector, pl.Items[0].Name)
				}

				// only use the first pod in the list
				podName = pl.Items[0].Name
				ns = pl.Items[0].Namespace
			} else {

	}
	// remove potentially existing address
	// Remove unix socket before use, if one is leftover from previous CNI restart
	if err := os.Remove(addr); err != nil && !os.IsNotExist(err) {
		// Anything other than "file not found" is an error.
		return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to remove unix://%s: %w", addr, err)
	}

	l, err := net.ListenUnix("unixpacket", resolvedAddr)
	if err != nil {

	// -A POSTROUTING -p tcp -j ISTIO_POSTRT
	iptablesBuilder.AppendRule(
		iptableslog.UndefinedCommand, iptablesconstants.POSTROUTING, iptablesconstants.NAT,
		"-j", ChainHostPostrouting,
	)

	// TODO BML I don't think we need UDP? TCP healthcheck redir should catch everything.

	// This is effectively an analog for Istio's old-style podSpec-based health check rewrites.

      # Controls whether or not the untaint controller is active
      enabled: false
      # What namespace the untaint controller should watch for istio-cni pods. This is only required when istio-cni is running in a different namespace than istiod
      namespace: ""
    affinity: {}
    tolerations: []
    cpu:
      targetAverageUtilization: 80
    memory: {}
    # targetAverageUtilization: 80

			containerID = candidateContainerID
		case containerID != candidateContainerID:
			// More than one container ID found in the cgroups.
			return "", "", fmt.Errorf("multiple container IDs found in cgroups (%s, %s)",
				containerID, candidateContainerID)
		case podUID != candidatePodUID:
			// More than one pod UID found in the cgroups.
			return "", "", fmt.Errorf("multiple pod UIDs found in cgroups (%s, %s)",