</configuration>
      </plugin>
      <plugin>
        <artifactId>maven-jar-plugin</artifactId>
        <configuration>
          <excludes>
            <!-- 2. Don't include the source in the jar (since that would let users depend on it from GWT client code, which is compiled from source). -->
            <exclude>**/ForceGuavaCompilation*</exclude>
            <exclude>**/DummyJavadocClass*</exclude>
          </excludes>

            <includes>
              <include>${test.include}</include>
            </includes>
            <!-- By having our own entries here, we also override the default exclusion filter, which excludes all nested classes. -->
            <excludes>
              <!-- https://github.com/google/guava/issues/2840 -->
              <exclude>%regex[.*PackageSanityTests.*.class]</exclude>

            <includes>
              <include>${test.include}</include>
            </includes>
            <!-- By having our own entries here, we also override the default exclusion filter, which excludes all nested classes. -->
            <excludes>
              <!-- https://github.com/google/guava/issues/2840 -->
              <exclude>%regex[.*PackageSanityTests.*.class]</exclude>

 *
 * <p>If not all classes on the classpath should be covered, {@link #ignoreClasses} can be used to
 * exclude certain classes. As a special case, classes with an underscore in the name (like {@code
 * AutoValue_Foo}) can be excluded using <code>ignoreClasses({@link #UNDERSCORE_IN_NAME})</code>.
 *
 * <p>{@link #setDefault} allows subclasses to specify default values for types.
 *

 *
 * <p>If not all classes on the classpath should be covered, {@link #ignoreClasses} can be used to
 * exclude certain classes. As a special case, classes with an underscore in the name (like {@code
 * AutoValue_Foo}) can be excluded using <code>ignoreClasses({@link #UNDERSCORE_IN_NAME})</code>.
 *
 * <p>{@link #setDefault} allows subclasses to specify default values for types.
 *

public class InvokableTest extends TestCase {
  // Historically Invokable inherited from java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject. That's no longer the
  // case, but we do check that its API still has the same public methods. We exclude some methods
  // that were added in Java 9 and that people probably weren't calling via Invokable, namely
  // `boolean canAccess(Object)`.
  public void testApiCompatibleWithAccessibleObject() {

public class InvokableTest extends TestCase {
  // Historically Invokable inherited from java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject. That's no longer the
  // case, but we do check that its API still has the same public methods. We exclude some methods
  // that were added in Java 9 and that people probably weren't calling via Invokable, namely
  // `boolean canAccess(Object)` and `boolean trySetAccessible()`.
  public void testApiCompatibleWithAccessibleObject() {

        }
        throw new IOException("Unable to delete " + from);
      }
    }
  }

  /**
   * Reads the first line from a file. The line does not include line-termination characters, but
   * does include other leading and trailing whitespace.
   *
   * @param file the file to read from
   * @param charset the charset used to decode the input stream; see {@link StandardCharsets} for

   * cannot implement that interface in source code in a way that will compile on both Java 7 and
   * Java 8. If we include the {@code getAnnotatedBounds()} method then its return type means it
   * won't compile on Java 7, while if we don't include the method then the compiler will complain
   * that an abstract method is unimplemented. So instead we use a dynamic proxy to get an

       *
       * We already know that that's how it behaves, and subclasses of Converter can't change that
       * behavior. So there's no sense in making all subclass authors exclude the method from any
       * NullPointerTester tests that they have.
       */
      ignoredMembers.add(Converter.class.getMethod("apply", Object.class));
    } catch (NoSuchMethodException shouldBeImpossible) {