}
    },

    /**
     * Disables cycle detection. This option causes the factory to return unmodified lock
     * implementations provided by the JDK, and is provided to allow applications to easily
     * parameterize when cycle detection is enabled.
     *
     * <p>Note that locks created by a factory with this policy will not participate the
     * cycle detection performed by locks created by other factories.
     */

  }

  public void testSetIndirectSelf_toString() {
    final SettableFuture<Object> orig = SettableFuture.create();
    // unlike the above this indirection defeats the trivial cycle detection and causes a SOE
    orig.setFuture(
        new ForwardingListenableFuture<Object>() {
          @Override
          protected ListenableFuture<Object> delegate() {
            return orig;
          }

   *     <i>descending order</i>
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code k} is negative
   * @since 8.0
   */
  public <E extends T> List<E> greatestOf(Iterable<E> iterable, int k) {
    // TODO(kevinb): see if delegation is hurting performance noticeably
    // TODO(kevinb): if we change this implementation, add full unit tests.
    return this.<E>reverse().leastOf(iterable, k);
  }

  /**

      if (count == 0 && !isLinkedHash) {
        contents = new ObjectCountLinkedHashMap<E>(contents);
        isLinkedHash = true;
        // to preserve insertion order through deletions, we have to switch to an actual linked
        // implementation at least for now, but this should be a super rare case
      } else if (buildInvoked) {
        contents = new ObjectCountHashMap<E>(contents);

  }

  public void testSetIndirectSelf_toString() {
    final SettableFuture<Object> orig = SettableFuture.create();
    // unlike the above this indirection defeats the trivial cycle detection and causes a SOE
    orig.setFuture(
        new ForwardingListenableFuture<Object>() {
          @Override
          protected ListenableFuture<Object> delegate() {
            return orig;
          }

  /** Constructor for use by subclasses. */
  protected Equivalence() {}

  /**
   * Returns {@code true} if the given objects are considered equivalent.
   *
   * <p>This method describes an <i>equivalence relation</i> on object references, meaning that for
   * all references {@code x}, {@code y}, and {@code z} (any of which may be null):
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>{@code equivalent(x, x)} is true (<i>reflexive</i> property)

{
  /** Constructor for use by subclasses. */
  protected Equivalence() {}

  /**
   * Returns {@code true} if the given objects are considered equivalent.
   *
   * <p>This method describes an <i>equivalence relation</i> on object references, meaning that for
   * all references {@code x}, {@code y}, and {@code z} (any of which may be null):
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>{@code equivalent(x, x)} is true (<i>reflexive</i> property)

   *
   * <p>Being reflexive, antisymmetric and transitive, the {@code encloses} relation defines a
   * <i>partial order</i> over ranges. There exists a unique {@linkplain Range#all maximal} range
   * according to this relation, and also numerous {@linkplain #isEmpty minimal} ranges. Enclosure
   * also implies {@linkplain #isConnected connectedness}.
   */

   *       Double.NEGATIVE_INFINITY} are fuzzily equal only to themselves.
   * </ul>
   *
   * <p>This is reflexive and symmetric, but not transitive, so it is not an
   * equivalence relation and not suitable for use in {@link Object#equals}
   * implementations.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code tolerance} is {@code < 0} or NaN
   * @since 13.0
   */