* {@code <A>} using our implementation unless some of its bounds have changed in resolution. This
   * avoids creating unequal TypeVariable implementation unnecessarily. When the bounds do change,
   * however, it's fine for the synthetic TypeVariable to be unequal to any native TypeVariable
   * anyway.
   */
  static final class NativeTypeVariableEquals<X> {
    static final boolean NATIVE_TYPE_VARIABLE_ONLY =

   *
   * <pre>{@code
   * Optional<Number> optionalInt = (Optional) getSomeOptionalInt();
   * Number value = optionalInt.or(0.5); // fine
   *
   * FluentIterable<? extends Number> numbers = getSomeNumbers();
   * Optional<Number> first = (Optional) numbers.first();
   * Number value = first.or(0.5); // fine
   * }</pre>
   *
   * <p><b>Comparison to {@code java.util.Optional}:</b> this method is similar to Java 8's {@code

    assertTransformIterator(list);
  }

  /**
   * This test depends on the fact that {@code AbstractSequentialList.iterator} transforms the
   * {@code iterator()} call into a call on {@code listIterator(int)}. This is fine because the
   * behavior is clearly documented so it's not expected to change.
   */
  public void testTransformedSequentialIterationUsesBackingListIterationOnly() {

                   Failed to check signatures: Bad class file .../CollectionFuture$ListFuture.class

                   One way of dealing with that would be to disable
                   animal-sniffer. And that would be fine for our -jre builds:
                   If we're building with JDK8, then clearly we're sticking to
                   JDK8 APIs. However, I assume (but did not confirm) that we'd

    } catch (NullPointerException expected) {
    }
    ImmutableList<String> result = builder.build();

    /*
     * Maybe it rejects all elements, or maybe it adds "a" before failing.
     * Either way is fine with us.
     */
    if (result.isEmpty()) {
      return;
    }
    assertTrue(ImmutableList.of("a").equals(result));
    assertEquals(1, result.size());
  }

    assertTransformIterator(list);
  }

  /**
   * This test depends on the fact that {@code AbstractSequentialList.iterator} transforms the
   * {@code iterator()} call into a call on {@code listIterator(int)}. This is fine because the
   * behavior is clearly documented so it's not expected to change.
   */
  public void testTransformedSequentialIterationUsesBackingListIterationOnly() {

   * Interface[]) creates a RegularImmutableSortedSet backed by an array of that
   * type. Later, RegularImmutableSortedSet.toArray() calls System.arraycopy()
   * to copy from that array to the destination array. This would be fine, but
   * GWT has a bug: It refuses to copy from an E[] to an Object[] when E is an
   * interface type.
   */
  // TODO: test other collections for this problem
  public void testOf_gwtArraycopyBug() {
    /*

   *
   * <pre>{@code
   * Optional<Number> optionalInt = (Optional) getSomeOptionalInt();
   * Number value = optionalInt.or(0.5); // fine
   *
   * FluentIterable<? extends Number> numbers = getSomeNumbers();
   * Optional<Number> first = (Optional) numbers.first();
   * Number value = first.or(0.5); // fine
   * }</pre>
   *
   * <p><b>Comparison to {@code java.util.Optional}:</b> this method is similar to Java 8's {@code

     * are reserved for enums defined in BloomFilterStrategies; negative values are reserved for any
     * custom, stateful strategy we may define (e.g. any kind of strategy that would depend on user
     * input).
     */
    int ordinal();
  }

  /** The bit set of the BloomFilter (not necessarily power of 2!) */
  private final LockFreeBitArray bits;

       * we don't run the stripping test for technical reasons), then we'd be back to the problem
       * described above, since the supermethod is *not* annotated @AndroidIncompatible (since it
       * works fine with the other Table implementations).
       */
      return;
    }
    super.testNullPointerInstance();
  }

  private static boolean isAndroid() {