try {
      ImmutableDoubleArray.builder(-1);
      fail();
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException expected) {
    }
  }

  /**
   * If there's a bug in builder growth, we wouldn't know how to expose it. So, brute force the hell
   * out of it for a while and see what happens.
   */
  public void testBuilder_bruteForce() {
    for (int i = 0; i < reduceIterationsIfGwt(100); i++) {

    try {
      ImmutableLongArray.builder(-1);
      fail();
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException expected) {
    }
  }

  /**
   * If there's a bug in builder growth, we wouldn't know how to expose it. So, brute force the hell
   * out of it for a while and see what happens.
   */
  public void testBuilder_bruteForce() {
    for (int i = 0; i < reduceIterationsIfGwt(100); i++) {

 *
 * ... or as a single "flattened" collection of key-value pairs:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>a → 1
 *   <li>a → 2
 *   <li>b → 3
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p><b>Important:</b> although the first interpretation resembles how most multimaps are
 * <i>implemented</i>, the design of the {@code Multimap} API is based on the <i>second</i> form.
 * So, using the multimap shown above as an example, the {@link #size} is {@code 3}, not {@code 2},

   * values are null. This method may update {@code alternatingKeysAndValues} if there are duplicate
   * keys. If so, the return value will indicate how many entries are still valid, and will also
   * include a {@link Builder.DuplicateKey} in case duplicate keys are not allowed now or will not
   * be allowed on a later {@link Builder#buildOrThrow()} call.
   *

 *   }
 * } else {
 *   // do other things since the monitor was not available
 * }
 * }</pre>
 *
 * <h2>Comparison with {@code synchronized} and {@code ReentrantLock}</h2>
 *
 * <p>The following examples show a simple threadsafe holder expressed using {@code synchronized},
 * {@link ReentrantLock}, and {@code Monitor}.
 *
 * <h3>{@code synchronized}</h3>
 *

   *     minValue()}
   */
  @CheckForNull
  public abstract C previous(C value);

  /**
   * Returns a signed value indicating how many nested invocations of {@link #next} (if positive) or
   * {@link #previous} (if negative) are needed to reach {@code end} starting from {@code start}.

/** Tests the package level *impl methods directly using various types of lists. */
@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
public class ListsImplTest extends TestCase {

  /** Describes how a list is modifiable */
  public enum Modifiability {
    NONE, // immutable lists
    BY_ELEMENT, // elements can change (set), but not structure

   * 1] < [1, 2] < [2]}.
   *
   * <p>Note that {@code Collections.reverseOrder(lexicographical(comparator))} is not equivalent to
   * {@code lexicographical(Collections.reverseOrder(comparator))} (consider how each would order
   * {@code [1]} and {@code [1, 1]}).
   */
  // Note: 90% of the time we don't add type parameters or wildcards that serve only to "tweak" the

   * throwable} followed by its cause hierarchy. Note that this is a snapshot of the cause chain and
   * will not reflect any subsequent changes to the cause chain.
   *
   * <p>Here's an example of how it can be used to find specific types of exceptions in the cause
   * chain:
   *
   * <pre>
   * Iterables.filter(Throwables.getCausalChain(e), IOException.class));
   * </pre>
   *

   * throwable} followed by its cause hierarchy. Note that this is a snapshot of the cause chain and
   * will not reflect any subsequent changes to the cause chain.
   *
   * <p>Here's an example of how it can be used to find specific types of exceptions in the cause
   * chain:
   *
   * <pre>
   * Iterables.filter(Throwables.getCausalChain(e), IOException.class));
   * </pre>
   *