"path",
                "item_id"
            ],
            "msg": "value is not a valid integer",
            "type": "type_error.integer"
        }
    ]
}
```

eine Textversion:

```
1 validation error
path -> item_id
  value is not a valid integer (type=type_error.integer)
```

#### `RequestValidationError` vs. `ValidationError`

!!! warning "Achtung"

                "path",
                "item_id"
            ],
            "msg": "value is not a valid integer",
            "type": "type_error.integer"
        }
    ]
}
```

você receberá a versão em texto:

```
1 validation error
path -> item_id
  value is not a valid integer (type=type_error.integer)
```

### `RequestValidationError` vs `ValidationError`

  }

  companion object {
    /** Arbitrary code point that's 2 bytes in UTF-8 and valid in IdnaMappingTable.txt. */
    private const val UNICODE_2 = 0x1a5

    /** Arbitrary code point that's 3 bytes in UTF-8 and valid in IdnaMappingTable.txt. */
    private const val UNICODE_3 = 0x2202

    /** Arbitrary code point that's 4 bytes in UTF-8 and valid in IdnaMappingTable.txt. */
    private const val UNICODE_4 = 0x1d11e

    /**

  `comp:` etc.  At this stage we check if the PR is valid and meets certain
  quality requirements. For example, we check if the CLA is signed, PR has
  sufficient description, if applicable unit tests are added, if it is a
  reasonable contribution (meaning it is not a single liner cosmetic PR).

**2. Valid?**

-   If the PR passes all the quality checks then we go ahead and assign a
    reviewer.

  //      implementations prior to v1.22)
  //   2. Signer whose configured maximum is shorter than the requested duration
  //   3. Signer whose configured minimum is longer than the requested duration
  //
  // The minimum valid value for expirationSeconds is 600, i.e. 10 minutes.
  //
  // +optional
  optional int32 expirationSeconds = 8;

  // usages specifies a set of key usages requested in the issued certificate.
  //

                "path",
                "item_id"
            ],
            "msg": "value is not a valid integer",
            "type": "type_error.integer"
        }
    ]
}
```

вы получите текстовую версию:

```
1 validation error
path -> item_id
  value is not a valid integer (type=type_error.integer)
```

#### `RequestValidationError` или `ValidationError`

The same would happen if you had something like a <abbr title='A union between multiple types means "any of these types".'>union</abbr> between different types where one or more of them are not valid Pydantic types, for example this would fail 💥:

   * Attack the CA intermediates check by presenting unrelated chains to the handshake vs.
   * certificate pinner.
   *
   * This chain is valid but not pinned:
   *
   * ```
   *   attackerCa
   *    -> phonyVictim
   * ```
   *
   *
   * This chain is pinned but not valid:
   *
   * ```
   *   attackerCa
   *     -> pinnedRoot (trusted by CertificatePinner)

| Params        | Value                                              |
| :--           | :--                                                |
| *Type*        | *Integer*                                          |
| *Valid Range* | *Minimum value of 900. Maximum value of 31536000.* |
| *Required*    | *No*                                               |

### Policy

  repeated MutatingWebhookConfiguration items = 2;
}

// Rule is a tuple of APIGroups, APIVersion, and Resources.It is recommended
// to make sure that all the tuple expansions are valid.
message Rule {
  // APIGroups is the API groups the resources belong to. '*' is all groups.
  // If '*' is present, the length of the slice must be one.
  // Required.
  // +listType=atomic