* like [poll]. It is only usable within task faker tasks.
   */
  private inner class TaskFakerBlockingQueue<T>(
    val delegate: BlockingQueue<T>,
  ) : AbstractQueue<T>(), BlockingQueue<T> {
    override val size: Int = delegate.size

    private var editCount = 0

    override fun poll(): T = delegate.poll()

    override fun poll(
      timeout: Long,
      unit: TimeUnit,

    synchronized(this@RealWebSocket) {
      if (failed) {
        return false // Failed web socket.
      }

      writer = this.writer
      pong = pongQueue.poll()
      if (pong == null) {
        messageOrClose = messageAndCloseQueue.poll()
        if (messageOrClose is Close) {
          receivedCloseCode = this.receivedCloseCode
          receivedCloseReason = this.receivedCloseReason

    )

    taskFaker.assertNoMoreTasks()
  }

  /**
   * This test causes two connections to become available simultaneously, one from a TCP connect and
   * one from the pool. We must take the pooled connection because by taking it from the pool, we've
   * fully acquired it.
   *
   * This test yields threads to force the decision of plan1 to be deliberate and not lucky. In
   * particular, we set up this sequence of events:

   * @return the head of the request queue
   */
  @Throws(InterruptedException::class)
  fun takeRequest(
    timeout: Long,
    unit: TimeUnit,
  ): RecordedRequest? = requestQueue.poll(timeout, unit)

  /**
   * Scripts [response] to be returned to a request made in sequence. The first request is
   * served by the first enqueued response; the second request by the second enqueued response; and

    // Running at time 75, the pool returns that nothing can be evicted until time 150.
    assertThat(pool.closeConnections(75L)).isEqualTo(75L)
    assertThat(pool.connectionCount()).isEqualTo(2)

    // Running at time 149, the pool returns that nothing can be evicted until time 150.
    assertThat(pool.closeConnections(149L)).isEqualTo(1L)
    assertThat(pool.connectionCount()).isEqualTo(2)

!!! tip "Tipp"
    Sie können <a href="https://help.github.com/en/github/collaborating-with-issues-and-pull-requests/commenting-on-a-pull-request" class="external-link" target="_blank">Kommentare mit Änderungsvorschlägen</a> zu vorhandenen Pull Requests hinzufügen.

## Review Pull Requests

You can help me review pull requests from others.

Again, please try your best to be kind. 🤗

---

Here's what to keep in mind and how to review a pull request:

### Understand the problem

  @Throws(IOException::class)
  override fun plan(): Plan {
    val reuseCallConnection = planReuseCallConnection()
    if (reuseCallConnection != null) return reuseCallConnection

    // Attempt to get a connection from the pool.
    val pooled1 = planReusePooledConnection()
    if (pooled1 != null) return pooled1

    // Attempt a deferred plan before new routes.
    if (deferredPlans.isNotEmpty()) return deferredPlans.removeFirst()

  }

  /**
   * We had a bug where web socket connections were leaked if the HTTP connection upgrade was not
   * successful. This test confirms that connections are released back to the connection pool!
   * https://github.com/square/okhttp/issues/4258
   */
  @Test
  @Throws(Exception::class)
  fun webSocketConnectionIsReleased() {
    // This test assumes HTTP/1.1 pooling semantics.
    client =

 *  New: `ConnectionPool.setPolicy()` configures a minimum connection pool size for a target
    address. Use this to proactively open HTTP connections.

    Connections opened to fulfill this policy are subject to the connection pool's
    `keepAliveDuration` but do not count against the pool-wide `maxIdleConnections` limit.