// -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    // TODO These two tests display a lack of symmetry with respect to the input which is a free form string and the
    //      mojo descriptor which comes back. All the free form parsing needs to be done somewhere else, this is
    //      really the function of the CLI, and then the pre-processing of that output still needs to be fed into

  public <T extends @Nullable Object> T[] toArray(T[] array) {
    return snapshot().toArray(array);
  }

  /*
   * We'd love to use 'new ArrayList(this)' or 'list.addAll(this)', but
   * either of these would recurse back to us again!
   */
  private List<E> snapshot() {
    List<E> list = Lists.newArrayListWithExpectedSize(size());
    for (Multiset.Entry<E> entry : entrySet()) {
      E element = entry.getElement();

   * This test is for a case where two Service.Listener callbacks for the same service would call
   * transitionService in the wrong order due to a race. Due to the fact that it is a race this test
   * isn't guaranteed to expose the issue, but it is at least likely to become flaky if the race
   * sneaks back in, and in this case flaky means something is definitely wrong.
   *
   * <p>Before the bug was fixed this test would fail at least 30% of the time.

  }

  /**
   * Provides a lexicographical comparator implementation; either a Java implementation or a faster
   * implementation based on {@link Unsafe}.
   *
   * <p>Uses reflection to gracefully fall back to the Java implementation if {@code Unsafe} isn't
   * available.
   */
  @VisibleForTesting
  static class LexicographicalComparatorHolder {
    static final String UNSAFE_COMPARATOR_NAME =

   * Finalizer directly with no problems.
   *
   * If this library is loaded in an application class loader, it's important that Finalizer not
   * have a strong reference back to the class loader. Otherwise, you could have a graph like this:
   *
   * Finalizer Thread runs instance of -> Finalizer.class loaded by -> Application class loader

   * href="https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/GraphsExplained#non-recursiveness">recursively</a>.
   * This is because the {@code forTree()}-based implementations don't keep track of visited nodes,
   * and therefore don't need to call `equals()` or `hashCode()` on the node objects; this saves
   * both time and space versus traversing the same graph using {@code forGraph()}.
   *

   * href="https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/GraphsExplained#non-recursiveness">recursively</a>.
   * This is because the {@code forTree()}-based implementations don't keep track of visited nodes,
   * and therefore don't need to call `equals()` or `hashCode()` on the node objects; this saves
   * both time and space versus traversing the same graph using {@code forGraph()}.
   *

            throwValidationError(messages -> messages.addErrorsCrudCouldNotFindCrudTable(GLOBAL, id), this::asListHtml);
        });
        saveToken();
        if (form.crudMode.intValue() == CrudMode.EDIT) {
            // back
            form.crudMode = CrudMode.DETAILS;
            return asDetailsHtml();
        }
        form.crudMode = CrudMode.EDIT;
        return asEditHtml();
    }

            throwValidationError(messages -> messages.addErrorsCrudCouldNotFindCrudTable(GLOBAL, id), this::asListHtml);
        });
        saveToken();
        if (form.crudMode.intValue() == CrudMode.EDIT) {
            // back
            form.crudMode = CrudMode.DETAILS;
            return asDetailsHtml();
        }
        form.crudMode = CrudMode.EDIT;
        return asEditHtml();
    }

         * ended up with a magic value that is not compatible with the type of the configured mojo parameter (a string
         * could still be converted by the configurator so we leave those alone). If so, back off to evaluating the
         * expression from properties only.
         */
        if (value != null && type != null && !(value instanceof String) && !isTypeCompatible(type, value)) {
            value = null;