import jcifs.internal.smb2.rdma.RdmaMemoryRegion;

/**
 * DiSNI memory region implementation.
 *
 * This class would integrate with DiSNI to provide registered
 * memory regions for high-performance RDMA operations.
 *
 * Note: This is a skeleton implementation. A real implementation would
 * require proper DiSNI integration with actual memory registration.
 */
public class DisniMemoryRegion extends RdmaMemoryRegion {

    * You wouldn't write an application in Uvicorn directly. That would mean that your code would have to include more or less, at least, all the code provided by Starlette (or **FastAPI**). And if you did that, your final application would have the same overhead as having used a framework and minimizing your app code and bugs.

depend on the resources of dependencies with `yield`.

For example, instead of using the same database session, you would create a new database session inside of the background task, and you would obtain the objects from the database using this new session. And then instead of passing the object from the database as a parameter to the background task function, you would pass the ID of that object and then obtain the object again inside the background task function....

Embedding a Java runtime in the distribution would provide some benefits, such as allowing the Launcher, Daemon and Workers to run on it, removing the prerequisite of an installed Java runtime.
However, this does not fully remove the prerequisite, as the Wrapper itself would still need an installed Java runtime to execute.

If you use a `requirements.txt` file you could specify the version with:

```txt
fastapi[standard]==0.112.0
```

that would mean that you would use exactly the version `0.112.0`.

Or you could also pin it with:

```txt
fastapi[standard]>=0.112.0,<0.113.0
```

You could load it at the top level of the module/file, but that would also mean that it would **load the model** even if you are just running a simple automated test, then that test would be **slow** because it would have to wait for the model to load before being able to run an independent part of the code.

      // the operation would be a no-op, so exceptions are allowed but not required
    }
    expectUnchanged();
  }

  @MapFeature.Require(absent = SUPPORTS_PUT)
  public void testReplaceEntry_unsupportedAbsentKey() {
    try {
      getMap().replace(k3(), v3(), v4());
    } catch (UnsupportedOperationException tolerated) {
      // the operation would be a no-op, so exceptions are allowed but not required

      // the operation would be a no-op, so exceptions are allowed but not required
    }
    expectUnchanged();
  }

  @MapFeature.Require(absent = SUPPORTS_PUT)
  public void testReplaceEntry_unsupportedAbsentKey() {
    try {
      getMap().replace(k3(), v3(), v4());
    } catch (UnsupportedOperationException tolerated) {
      // the operation would be a no-op, so exceptions are allowed but not required

```Python
{"id": id}
```

For example, with an ID of `42`, this would render:

```html
Item ID: 42
```

### Template `url_for` Arguments { #template-url-for-arguments }

You can also use `url_for()` inside of the template, it takes as arguments the same arguments that would be used by your *path operation function*.

So, the section with:

{% raw %}

```jinja

If it was in a type annotation we could have used the vertical bar, as:

```Python
some_variable: PlaneItem | CarItem
```

But if we put that in the assignment `response_model=PlaneItem | CarItem` we would get an error, because Python would try to perform an **invalid operation** between `PlaneItem` and `CarItem` instead of interpreting that as a type annotation.