* This service provides customized URL fetching strategies including sequential and random ordering
 * based on crawling configuration parameters.
 */
public class FessUrlQueueService extends OpenSearchUrlQueueService {

    private static final Logger logger = LogManager.getLogger(FessUrlQueueService.class);

    /** Configuration value for sequential URL processing order */

    @SuppressWarnings({"unchecked", "DoNotMock"})
    Funnel<Object> elementFunnel = mock(Funnel.class);
    PrimitiveSink primitiveSink = mock(PrimitiveSink.class);
    Funnel<Iterable<?>> sequential = Funnels.sequentialFunnel(elementFunnel);
    sequential.funnel(Arrays.asList("foo", "bar", "baz", "quux"), primitiveSink);
    InOrder inOrder = inOrder(elementFunnel);
    inOrder.verify(elementFunnel).funnel("foo", primitiveSink);

   *   {@code List<ListenableFuture<T>> futures = (List) executor.invokeAll(tasks);}
   * </pre>
   *
   * @return A list of {@code ListenableFuture} instances representing the tasks, in the same
   *     sequential order as produced by the iterator for the given task list, each of which has
   *     completed.
   * @throws RejectedExecutionException {@inheritDoc}
   * @throws NullPointerException if any task is null
   */
  @Override

If you have traditional spinning (hdd) drives, some applications with high concurrency might require MinIO cluster to be tuned such that to avoid random I/O on the drives. The way to convert high concurrent I/O into a sequential I/O is by reducing the number of concurrent operations allowed per cluster. This allows MinIO cluster to be operationally resilient to such workloads, while also making sure the drives are at optimal efficiency and responsive.

 * decide not to by returning -1L.
 *
 * Task Queues
 * -----------
 *
 * Tasks are bound to the [TaskQueue] they are scheduled in. Each queue is sequential and the tasks
 * within it never execute concurrently. It is an error to use a task in multiple queues.
 */
abstract class Task(
  val name: String,
  val cancelable: Boolean = true,
) {

        assertEquals(999L, item.getId());

        // Verify direct field access
        assertEquals(999L, item.id);
    }

    public void test_sequentialIdAssignment() {
        // Test sequential ID assignment pattern
        TestDictionaryItem[] items = new TestDictionaryItem[5];

        for (int i = 0; i < items.length; i++) {
            items[i] = new TestDictionaryItem();
            items[i].id = i + 1;

   * same result.
   */
  enum CollectStrategy {
    /** Get one accumulator and accumulate the elements into it sequentially. */
    SEQUENTIAL {
      @Override
      final <T extends @Nullable Object, A extends @Nullable Object, R extends @Nullable Object>
          A result(Collector<T, A, R> collector, Iterable<T> inputs) {

package okhttp3.internal.concurrent

import java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch
import java.util.concurrent.RejectedExecutionException
import okhttp3.internal.okHttpName

/**
 * A set of tasks that are executed in sequential order.
 *
 * Work within queues is not concurrent. This is equivalent to each queue having a dedicated thread
 * for its work; in practice a set of queues may share a set of threads to save resources.
 */

server.

Historically everything to MinIO was provided via command arguments for the hostnames and the drives via an ellipses syntax such as `minio server http://host{1...4}/disk{1...4}` this requirement added an additional burden to have sequential hostnames for us to make sure that we can provide horizontal distribution, however we have come across situations where sometimes this is not feasible and there are no easier alternatives without modifying /etc/hosts on the host system as root user....

This is necessary for bookkeeping when creating new streams. Correct framing requires that stream IDs are sequential on the socket, so we need to bundle assigning the ID with sending the `SYN_STREAM` frame.

## Connection Pool