- Target location from where the objects must be copied to
- Fine grained filtering is available to pick relevant objects from source to copy from

MinIO batch jobs framework also provides

- Retrying a failed job automatically driven by user input
- Monitoring job progress in real-time
- Send notifications upon completion or failure to user configured target

## Retrying Requests

Sometimes connections fail: either a pooled connection was stale and disconnected, or the webserver itself couldn’t be reached. OkHttp will retry the request with a different route if one is available.

  }

  @Test
  fun namePrefixIgnored() {
    consumeEvents(
      """
      |data: a
      |eventually
      |database
      |identity
      |retrying
      |
      |
      """.trimMargin(),
    )
    assertThat(callbacks.remove()).isEqualTo(Event(null, null, "a"))
  }

  @Test
  fun nakedNameClearsIdAndTypeAppendsData() {
    consumeEvents(

					continue
				}
			}

			now := time.Now()
			if now.Sub(u.Queued) < time.Second {
				// let recently failed networks to reconnect
				// making MRF wait for 1s before retrying,
				// i.e 4 reconnect attempts.
				time.Sleep(time.Second)
			}

			// wait on timer per heal
			wait := healSleeper.Timer(context.Background())

			scan := madmin.HealNormalScan

package clause

type Returning struct {
	Columns []Column
}

// Name where clause name
func (returning Returning) Name() string {
	return "RETURNING"
}

// Build build where clause
func (returning Returning) Build(builder Builder) {
	if len(returning.Columns) > 0 {
		for idx, column := range returning.Columns {
			if idx > 0 {
				builder.WriteByte(',')
			}

			builder.WriteQuoted(column)
		}
	} else {

 * second invocation, so implementors have made various choices, including:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>returning the same iterator again
 *   <li>throwing an exception of some kind
 *   <li>or the usual, <i>robust</i> behavior, which all known {@link Collection} implementations
 *       have, of returning a new, independent iterator
 * </ul>
 *

 * second invocation, so implementors have made various choices, including:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>returning the same iterator again
 *   <li>throwing an exception of some kind
 *   <li>or the usual, <i>robust</i> behavior, which all known {@link Collection} implementations
 *       have, of returning a new, independent iterator
 * </ul>
 *

   * next} field is lazily initialized. The type of that field would be {@code @Nullable T}, and the
   * code would be responsible for populating a "real" {@code T} (which might still be the value
   * {@code null}!) before returning it to callers. Depending on how the code is structured, a
   * nullness analysis might not understand that the field has been populated. To avoid that problem

   * next} field is lazily initialized. The type of that field would be {@code @Nullable T}, and the
   * code would be responsible for populating a "real" {@code T} (which might still be the value
   * {@code null}!) before returning it to callers. Depending on how the code is structured, a
   * nullness analysis might not understand that the field has been populated. To avoid that problem

The benefit of raising an exception over returning a value will be more evident in the section about Dependencies and Security.

In this example, when the client requests an item by an ID that doesn't exist, raise an exception with a status code of `404`: