- For timestamp tests: use minimal delays (50-100ms)
- Clean only test-specific indices (not `_all` unless needed)
- Use `runner.refresh()` after index operations
- Test with realistic multilingual content

### Key Test Classes

- `SuggesterRefactoringTest` - Index lifecycle, alias management
- `SuggesterTest` - Core functionality
- `SuggestIndexerTest` - Indexing operations

        assertEquals("test_stackTracePresent", firstElement.getMethodName());
    }

    @Test
    public void test_multipleExceptionScenarios() {
        // Test multiple realistic exception scenarios

        // Scenario 1: Command not found
        CommandExecutionException cmdNotFound = new CommandExecutionException("Command 'xyz' not found");

end the class name of a benchmark with `Benchmark`. To have JMH execute a benchmark, annotate the respective methods with `@Benchmark`.

## Tips and Best Practices

To get realistic results, you should exercise care when running benchmarks. Here are a few tips:

### Do

* Ensure that the system executing your microbenchmarks has as little load as possible. Shutdown every process that can cause unnecessary

 *
 * <ol>
 *   <li>remove();
 *   <li>hasNext()
 *   <li>hasNext();
 *   <li>remove();
 *   <li>next();
 * </ol>
 *
 * <p>This particular order of operations may be unrealistic, and testing all 3^5 of them may be
 * thought of as overkill; however, it's difficult to determine which proper subset of this massive
 * set would be sufficient to expose any possible bug. Brute force is simpler.
 *

 *
 * <ol>
 *   <li>remove();
 *   <li>hasNext()
 *   <li>hasNext();
 *   <li>remove();
 *   <li>next();
 * </ol>
 *
 * <p>This particular order of operations may be unrealistic, and testing all 3^5 of them may be
 * thought of as overkill; however, it's difficult to determine which proper subset of this massive
 * set would be sufficient to expose any possible bug. Brute force is simpler.
 *