}

  static void clearInterrupt() {
    Thread.interrupted();
  }

  /**
   * Retrieves the result of a {@code Future} known to be done but uses the {@code get(long,
   * TimeUnit)} overload in order to test that method.
   */
  static <V extends @Nullable Object> V getDoneFromTimeoutOverload(Future<V> future)
      throws ExecutionException {

  }

  static void clearInterrupt() {
    Thread.interrupted();
  }

  /**
   * Retrieves the result of a {@code Future} known to be done but uses the {@code get(long,
   * TimeUnit)} overload in order to test that method.
   */
  static <V extends @Nullable Object> V getDoneFromTimeoutOverload(Future<V> future)
      throws ExecutionException {

                  MoreExecutors.directExecutor());
            })
        .then(onFulfilled, onRejected);
  }
}

/**
 * Subset of the elemental2 IThenable interface without the single-parameter overload, which allows
 * us to implement it using a default implementation in J2cl ListenableFuture.
 */
@JsType(isNative = true, namespace = JsPackage.GLOBAL, name = "IThenable")
interface IThenable<T extends @Nullable Object> {

import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Unit test for {@link FakeTicker}.
 *
 * @author Jige Yu
 */
@GwtCompatible
// We also want to test the TimeUnit overload (especially under GWT, where it's the only option).
@SuppressWarnings("SetAutoIncrementStep_Nanos")
@NullUnmarked
public class FakeTickerTest extends TestCase {

  @GwtIncompatible // NullPointerTester

import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Unit test for {@link FakeTicker}.
 *
 * @author Jige Yu
 */
@GwtCompatible
// We also want to test the TimeUnit overload (especially under GWT, where it's the only option).
@SuppressWarnings("SetAutoIncrementStep_Nanos")
@NullUnmarked
public class FakeTickerTest extends TestCase {

  @GwtIncompatible // NullPointerTester

        throw RejectedExecutionException()
      }

      if (scheduleAndDecide(task, delayNanos, recurrence = false)) {
        taskRunner.kickCoordinator(this)
      }
    }
  }

  /**
   * Overload of [schedule] that uses a lambda for a repeating task.
   *
   * TODO: make this inline once this is fixed: https://github.com/oracle/graal/issues/3466
   */
  fun schedule(
    name: String,
    delayNanos: Long = 0L,

    new EqualsTester()
        .addEqualityGroup(wrapperFunction.apply(instance), wrapperFunction.apply(instance))
        .addEqualityGroup(wrapperFunction.apply(generator.newFreshProxy(interfaceType)))
        // TODO: add an overload to EqualsTester to print custom error message?
        .testEquals();
  }

  private static <T> void testToString(
      Class<T> interfaceType, Function<? super T, ? extends T> wrapperFunction) {

    new EqualsTester()
        .addEqualityGroup(wrapperFunction.apply(instance), wrapperFunction.apply(instance))
        .addEqualityGroup(wrapperFunction.apply(generator.newFreshProxy(interfaceType)))
        // TODO: add an overload to EqualsTester to print custom error message?
        .testEquals();
  }

  private static <T> void testToString(
      Class<T> interfaceType, Function<? super T, ? extends T> wrapperFunction) {

* Some public APIs have incorrect nullability annotations (both overly restrictive and overly permissive)

While there are competing ways to represent absence (`Optional`, "Null Object" pattern, method overloads),
it is unlikely that we'll be able to remove `null` entirely.

After migrating to Java 8, we can use pluggable type checkers to ensure that our annotations are consistent, 
and there are no missing null checks.

    * Wenn Sie FastAPI nicht verwenden und stattdessen Starlette direkt (oder ein anderes Tool wie Sanic, Flask, Responder, usw.) verwenden würden, müssten Sie die gesamte Datenvalidierung und Serialisierung selbst implementieren. Ihre finale Anwendung hätte also immer noch den gleichen Overhead, als ob sie mit FastAPI erstellt worden wäre. Und in vielen Fällen...