Set.of() // errors
                    );

            UpgradeResult result2 = new UpgradeResult(
                    Set.of(pom1), // processed (overlap)
                    Set.of(pom1, pom2), // modified (overlap + new)
                    Set.of() // errors
                    );

            UpgradeResult merged = result1.merge(result2);

      TYPE_PRIORITY, TYPE_RST_STREAM, TYPE_GOAWAY, TYPE_WINDOW_UPDATE -> return BINARY[flags]
    }
    val result = if (flags < FLAGS.size) FLAGS[flags]!! else BINARY[flags]
    // Special case types that have overlap flag values.
    return when {
      type == TYPE_PUSH_PROMISE && flags and FLAG_END_PUSH_PROMISE != 0 -> {
        result.replace("HEADERS", "PUSH_PROMISE") // TODO: Avoid allocation.
      }

    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    id: orthogonality
    attributes:
      label: "Orthogonality: How does this change interact or overlap with existing features?"
      description: "Is the goal of this change a performance improvement? If so, what quantifiable improvement should we expect? How would we measure it?"
    validations:
      required: false

Also, the best approach was to use already existing standards.

So, before even starting to code **FastAPI**, I spent several months studying the specs for OpenAPI, JSON Schema, OAuth2, etc. Understanding their relationship, overlap, and differences.

## Design { #design }

Then I spent some time designing the developer "API" I wanted to have as a user (as a developer using FastAPI).

	}
	// Mask matches maskString, should get result
	if err := ps.Subscribe(Mask(1|2), ch2, doneCh, func(entry Maskable) bool { return true }); err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("unexpected error: %v", err)
	}
	// Does NOT overlap maskString
	if err := ps.Subscribe(Mask(2), ch3, doneCh, func(entry Maskable) bool { return true }); err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("unexpected error: %v", err)
	}
	val := maskString("hello")
	ps.Publish(val)

 *
 * Mappings Data (4,719 bytes)
 * ===========================
 *
 * This is UTF-8 character data. It is indexed into by b2b3 in the ranges dataset.
 *
 * Mappings may overlap.
 *
 * ASCII-Only
 * ==========
 *
 * Neither the section index nor the ranges data use bit 0x80 anywhere. That means the data is

    }

    // Happy path: overlaps delegates to implementation and returns as stubbed
    @Test
    @DisplayName("overlaps returns true then false as stubbed")
    void overlapsReturnsTrueThenFalse() throws Exception {
        when(locator.overlaps(other)).thenReturn(true, false);

        assertTrue(locator.overlaps(other));
        assertFalse(locator.overlaps(other));

	return Mask(m.Mask())
}

// Contains returns whether *all* flags in other is present in t.
func (t Mask) Contains(other Mask) bool {
	return t&other == other
}

// Overlaps returns whether *any* flags in t overlaps with other.
func (t Mask) Overlaps(other Mask) bool {
	return t&other != 0
}

// SingleType returns whether t has a single type set.
func (t Mask) SingleType() bool {
	return bits.OnesCount64(uint64(t)) == 1
}

    /**
     * Determines whether this resource path overlaps with another resource path by sharing a common root.
     *
     * @param other the other resource locator to compare with
     * @return whether the paths share a common root
     * @throws CIFSException if an error occurs during comparison
     */
    boolean overlaps(SmbResourceLocator other) throws CIFSException;

    /**

            context.unindent();
        }
    }

    /**
     * Logs the overall result of all strategy executions.
     */
    private void logOverallResult(UpgradeContext context, UpgradeResult overallResult) {
        context.info("=== Overall Results ===");
        context.indent();

        context.info("Total POMs processed: " + overallResult.processedPoms().size());