go target.Cancel()
	}
}

// UpdateHTTPWebhooks swaps system webhook targets with newly loaded ones from the cfg
func UpdateHTTPWebhooks(ctx context.Context, cfgs map[string]http.Config) (errs []error) {
	return updateHTTPTargets(ctx, cfgs, systemTargets)
}

// UpdateAuditWebhooks swaps audit webhook targets with newly loaded ones from the cfg
func UpdateAuditWebhooks(ctx context.Context, cfgs map[string]http.Config) (errs []error) {

We'd like to capture our architectural decisions about the build tool as [Architectural Decision Records (ADRs)](https://adr.github.io/).
For now we just have this global repository of ADRs.
If we see fit, we can break these out to per-platform ones, or keep a hybrid approach to having global and platform-specific ADSs.

Our aim is to keep the process lightweight and approachable.

    override fun execute(details: CompatibilityCheckDetails<NullawayState>) {
        with(details) {
            when {
                // Nullaway-enabled targets must not depend on nullaway-disabled ones.
                // They can depend on nullaway-undefined, which any external dependency is going to be.
                producerValue == NullawayState.DISABLED && consumerValue == NullawayState.ENABLED -> incompatible()

        // Verify that the id and attributes are correctly set by the constructor
        assertEquals(sidMock, pacSidAttributes.getId(), "The SID should match the one provided in the constructor.");
        assertEquals(attributes, pacSidAttributes.getAttributes(), "The attributes should match the ones provided in the constructor.");
    }

    /**
     * Test method for {@link jcifs.pac.PacSidAttributes#getId()}.
     */
    @Test

abstract class GwtFuturesCatchingSpecialization {
  /*
   * This server copy of the class is empty. The corresponding GWT copy contains alternative
   * versions of catching() and catchingAsync() with slightly different signatures from the ones
   * found in Futures.java.
   */

    extends AbstractFuture<V> {
  /*
   * This server copy of the class is empty. The corresponding GWT copy contains alternative
   * versions of catching() and catchingAsync() with slightly different signatures from the ones
   * found in FluentFuture.java.
   */

It will all be combined and included in your OpenAPI, and shown in the API docs:

<img src="/img/tutorial/additional-responses/image01.png">

## Combine predefined responses and custom ones { #combine-predefined-responses-and-custom-ones }

You might want to have some predefined responses that apply to many *path operations*, but you want to combine them with custom responses needed by each *path operation*.

/**
 * Service provider interface for registering custom {@link Packaging} implementations.
 * <p>
 * This interface allows plugins and extensions to define and register additional packaging types
 * beyond the standard ones provided by Maven (like jar, war, ear, etc.). Implementations of this
 * interface will be discovered through the Java ServiceLoader mechanism and their provided
 * packaging types will be available throughout the Maven build process.

/**
 * Service provider interface for registering custom {@link Lifecycle} implementations.
 * <p>
 * This interface allows plugins and extensions to define and register additional build lifecycles
 * beyond the standard ones provided by Maven (like clean, default, site). Lifecycles define a sequence
 * of phases that can be executed during a build.
 * <p>
 * Implementations of this interface will be discovered through the Java ServiceLoader mechanism

/**
 * Service provider interface for registering custom {@link PathScope} implementations.
 * <p>
 * This interface allows plugins and extensions to define and register additional path scopes
 * beyond the standard ones provided by Maven. Path scopes define how dependencies are used
 * in different contexts, such as compilation, testing, or runtime.
 * <p>