}

    @Override
    public int[] call() throws Exception {
      int iterations = 100000;
      int nKeys = keys.size();
      int[] deltas = new int[nKeys];
      Operation[] operations = Operation.values();
      for (int i = 0; i < iterations; i++) {
        int keyIndex = random.nextInt(nKeys);
        String key = keys.get(keyIndex);
        Operation op = operations[random.nextInt(operations.length)];

  @Test
  fun hashCode_usesIdentityHashCode_legacyCase() {
    val cs = CipherSuite.TLS_RSA_EXPORT_WITH_RC4_40_MD5 // This one's javaName starts with "SSL_".
    assertThat(cs.hashCode(), cs.toString())
      .isEqualTo(System.identityHashCode(cs))
  }

  @Test
  fun hashCode_usesIdentityHashCode_regularCase() {
    // This one's javaName matches the identifier.
    val cs = CipherSuite.TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256

		go target.Cancel()
	}
}

// UpdateHTTPWebhooks swaps system webhook targets with newly loaded ones from the cfg
func UpdateHTTPWebhooks(ctx context.Context, cfgs map[string]http.Config) (errs []error) {
	return updateHTTPTargets(ctx, cfgs, systemTargets)
}

// UpdateAuditWebhooks swaps audit webhook targets with newly loaded ones from the cfg
func UpdateAuditWebhooks(ctx context.Context, cfgs map[string]http.Config) (errs []error) {

We'd like to capture our architectural decisions about the build tool as [Architectural Decision Records (ADRs)](https://adr.github.io/).
For now we just have this global repository of ADRs.
If we see fit, we can break these out to per-platform ones, or keep a hybrid approach to having global and platform-specific ADSs.

Our aim is to keep the process lightweight and approachable.

```
class MyTest(
  private val server: MockWebServer
) {
  @Test
  fun test() {
    ...
  }
}
```

Multiple instances can be obtained by naming additional ones:

```
class MyTest(
  private val server: MockWebServer,
  @MockWebServerInstance("server2") private val server2: MockWebServer,
  @MockWebServerInstance("server3") private val server3: MockWebServer
) {
  @Test

# Advanced Security

## Additional Features

There are some extra features to handle security apart from the ones covered in the [Tutorial - User Guide: Security](../../tutorial/security/index.md){.internal-link target=_blank}.

/// tip

The next sections are **not necessarily "advanced"**.

And it's possible that for your use case, the solution is in one of them.

///

## Read the Tutorial first

abstract class GwtFuturesCatchingSpecialization {
  /*
   * This server copy of the class is empty. The corresponding GWT copy contains alternative
   * versions of catching() and catchingAsync() with slightly different signatures from the ones
   * found in Futures.java.
   */

    extends AbstractFuture<V> {
  /*
   * This server copy of the class is empty. The corresponding GWT copy contains alternative
   * versions of catching() and catchingAsync() with slightly different signatures from the ones
   * found in FluentFuture.java.
   */

 * artifact publishing by reducing the artifacts and packaging reports that consist of multiple files.
 *
 * Reducing the number of reports also makes it easier to find the important ones when analysing a failed build in
 * Team City.
 */

val testFilesCleanup = extensions.create<TestFileCleanUpExtension>("testFilesCleanup").apply {
    reportOnly.convention(false)
}

    extends AbstractFuture<V> {
  /*
   * This server copy of the class is empty. The corresponding GWT copy contains alternative
   * versions of catching() and catchingAsync() with slightly different signatures from the ones
   * found in FluentFuture.java.
   */