buffer.put(readBuffer);
      munchIfFull();
      return this;
    }

    // First add just enough to fill buffer size, and munch that
    int bytesToCopy = bufferSize - buffer.position();
    for (int i = 0; i < bytesToCopy; i++) {
      buffer.put(readBuffer.get());
    }
    munch(); // buffer becomes empty here, since chunkSize divides bufferSize

    // Now process directly from the rest of the input buffer

        I end up not being able to add new features, fix bugs, review pull requests, etc. as fast as I wish because I have to spend too much time handling questions.

        All that, on top of all the incredible help provided by a bunch of community members, the [FastAPI Experts](https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/fastapi-people/#experts), that give a lot of their time to come here and help others.

net.ipv4.tcp_timestamps=0

# Increase throughput
net.ipv4.tcp_sack=1

# Low latency mode for TCP
net.ipv4.tcp_low_latency=1

# The following variable is used to tell the kernel how 
# much of the socket buffer space should be used for TCP 
# window size, and how much to save for an application buffer.
net.ipv4.tcp_adv_win_scale=1

# disable RFC2861 behavior
net.ipv4.tcp_slow_start_after_idle = 0

# Fix faulty network setups

description: Report a bug encountered while operating Kubernetes
labels: kind/bug
body:
  - type: textarea
    id: problem
    attributes:
      label: What happened?
      description: |
        Please provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner.
        If this matter is security related, please disclose it privately via https://kubernetes.io/security
    validations:

import com.google.gwt.junit.tools.GWTTestSuite;
import java.io.IOException;
import junit.framework.Test;
import junit.framework.TestCase;

/**
 * Runs all _gwt tests. Grouping them into a suite is much faster than running each as a one-test
 * "suite," as the per-suite setup is expensive.
 */
public class GwtTestSuite extends TestCase {
  public static Test suite() throws IOException {

 * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA  02111-1307  USA
 */

package jcifs.smb1.smb1;

class TransWaitNamedPipeResponse extends SmbComTransactionResponse {

    // not much to this one is there :~)

    TransWaitNamedPipeResponse() {
    }

    @Override
    int writeSetupWireFormat(final byte[] dst, final int dstIndex) {
        return 0;
    }

    @Override

import java.util.logging.Formatter
import java.util.logging.LogRecord

/**
 * Is Java8 Data and Time really this bad, or is writing this on a plane from just javadocs a bad
 * idea?
 *
 * Why so much construction?
 */
class OneLineLogFormat : Formatter() {
  private val d =
    DateTimeFormatterBuilder()
      .appendValue(HOUR_OF_DAY, 2)
      .appendLiteral(':')
      .appendValue(MINUTE_OF_HOUR, 2)

# Reference

Here's the reference or code API, the classes, functions, parameters, attributes, and
all the FastAPI parts you can use in your applications.

If you want to **learn FastAPI** you are much better off reading the

        These advantages can take
        [many forms](https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/PhilosophyExplained#utility), but taking
        the time to discuss them in detail will make it much clearer why this feature should be
        added to Guava.


        Please fill out the following fields to give us a better understanding of your proposed
        feature and its potential value for other Guava users.

title: "import/path: issue title"

body:
  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: |
        Thanks for helping us improve! 🙏 Please answer these questions and provide as much information as possible about your problem.

  - type: input
    id: go-version
    attributes:
      label: Go version
      description: |
        What version of Go are you using (`go version`)?