if (blob != null) {
            System.arraycopy(blob, 0, dst, dstIndex, blob.length);
            dstIndex += blob.length;
        } else {
            System.arraycopy(lmHash, 0, dst, dstIndex, lmHash.length);
            dstIndex += lmHash.length;
            System.arraycopy(ntHash, 0, dst, dstIndex, ntHash.length);
            dstIndex += ntHash.length;

            dstIndex += writeString(accountName, dst, dstIndex);

            System.arraycopy(this.blob, 0, dst, dstIndex, this.blob.length);
            dstIndex += this.blob.length;
        } else {
            System.arraycopy(this.lmHash, 0, dst, dstIndex, this.lmHash.length);
            dstIndex += this.lmHash.length;
            System.arraycopy(this.ntHash, 0, dst, dstIndex, this.ntHash.length);
            dstIndex += this.ntHash.length;

        // The actual implementation keeps lowercase for guest when Unicode is not enabled
        assertEquals("guest", accountName);
        assertEquals("DOM", primaryDomain);

        byte[] lm = (byte[]) getField(obj, "lmHash");
        byte[] nt = (byte[]) getField(obj, "ntHash");
        assertArrayEquals(new byte[0], lm);
        assertArrayEquals(new byte[0], nt);
    }

    @Test
    void unsupportedCredentialType() {

      value: >
        Comparing two approaches to a use case side by side can make it easier to examine the
        differences between them.


        Additionally, it's very useful to us if you can provide a "straw API" — what the
        method signatures would look like, for example, even if the method and class names are still
        in flux. This can make the feature you're suggesting much clearer to us.

  - type: textarea

        able to discuss the full details of what you're working on.


        But Guava aims to provide functionality that is useful across boundaries of projects,
        companies, or even industries — utilities useful for a sizable proportion of all Java
        programmers everywhere. If you can give enough detail such that any of us can imagine coming