private interface HierarchyFixtureInterface {
    // Exists only for hierarchy mapping; no members.
  }

  private interface HierarchyFixtureSubinterface extends HierarchyFixtureInterface {
    // Exists only for hierarchy mapping; no members.
  }

  private static class HierarchyFixtureParent implements HierarchyFixtureSubinterface {
    // Exists only for hierarchy mapping; no members.
  }

  private interface HierarchyFixtureInterface {
    // Exists only for hierarchy mapping; no members.
  }

  private interface HierarchyFixtureSubinterface extends HierarchyFixtureInterface {
    // Exists only for hierarchy mapping; no members.
  }

  private static class HierarchyFixtureParent implements HierarchyFixtureSubinterface {
    // Exists only for hierarchy mapping; no members.
  }

  @Override
  protected void setUp() throws Exception {
    super.setUp();

    handler = new TestLogHandler();

    // You could also apply it higher up the Logger hierarchy than this
    ExampleClassUnderTest.logger.addHandler(handler);

    ExampleClassUnderTest.logger.setUseParentHandlers(false); // optional

    stack.addTearDown(
        new TearDown() {
          @Override

     *
     * @return The parent directory of this SMB resource or
     *         <code>smb://</code> if the resource refers to the root of the URL
     *         hierarchy which incidentally is also <code>smb://</code>.
     */
    String getParent ();


    /**
     * Returns the full uncanonicalized URL of this SMB resource. An

  @Override
  protected void setUp() throws Exception {
    super.setUp();

    handler = new TestLogHandler();

    // You could also apply it higher up the Logger hierarchy than this
    ExampleClassUnderTest.logger.addHandler(handler);

    ExampleClassUnderTest.logger.setUseParentHandlers(false); // optional

    stack.addTearDown(
        new TearDown() {
          @Override

The simpler the problem solved by the tool, the better performance it will get. And most of the benchmarks don't test the additional features provided by the tool.

The hierarchy is like:

* **Uvicorn**: an ASGI server
    * **Starlette**: (uses Uvicorn) a web microframework

* Even dependencies can have dependencies, creating a hierarchy or **"graph" of dependencies**.
* All **automatically handled** by the framework.
* All the dependencies can require data from requests and **augment the path operation** constraints and automatic documentation.

Je einfacher das Problem, welches durch das Tool gelöst wird, desto besser ist die Performanz. Und die meisten Benchmarks testen nicht die zusätzlichen Funktionen, welche das Tool bietet.

Die Hierarchie ist wie folgt:

* **Uvicorn**: ein ASGI-Server
    * **Starlette**: (verwendet Uvicorn) ein Web-Mikroframework

Plus le problème résolu par un outil est simple, mieux seront les performances obtenues. Et la plupart des tests de performance ne prennent pas en compte les fonctionnalités additionnelles fournies par les outils.

La hiérarchie est la suivante :

* **Uvicorn** : un serveur ASGI
    * **Starlette** : (utilise Uvicorn) un micro-framework web