* on the fields of TimeoutFuture. This field is slightly different from the fields discussed
   * there: cancel() never reads this field, only writes to it. That makes the race here completely
   * harmless, rather than just 99.99% harmless.
   */
  @LazyInit private @Nullable List<@Nullable Present<V>> values;

  @SuppressWarnings("EmptyList") // ImmutableList doesn't support nullable element types
  CollectionFuture(

import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Test suite covering {@link Ints#asList(int[])}.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 */
@GwtCompatible
@SuppressWarnings("cast") // redundant casts are intentional and harmless
@NullUnmarked
@AndroidIncompatible // test-suite builders
public class IntArrayAsListTest extends TestCase {

  private static List<Integer> asList(Integer[] values) {
    int[] temp = new int[values.length];

       *
       * This has the nice-ish side effect of limiting reentrancy: run() calls
       * timeoutFuture.setException() calls run(). That reentrancy would already be harmless, since
       * timeoutFuture can be set (and delegate cancelled) only once. (And "set only once" is
       * important for other reasons: run() can still be invoked concurrently in different threads,

obligations, You may act only on Your own behalf and on Your sole 
responsibility, not on behalf of any other Contributor, and only if You 
agree to indemnify, defend, and hold each Contributor harmless for any 
liability incurred by, or claims asserted against, such Contributor by